Trump Demands Fed Cut Rates After Nasdaq Crash – Your Savings Are at Stake скачать в хорошем качестве

Trump Demands Fed Cut Rates After Nasdaq Crash – Your Savings Are at Stake

On February 18, 2026, President Donald Trump issued unprecedented public ultimatum to Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell at eight o'clock Eastern time via social media demanding that "The Fed must IMMEDIATELY cut rates by 50 basis points or it will have sabotaged the American economy," following Nasdaq Composite's four-point-two percent decline the previous trading session that erased approximately one trillion dollars in market capitalization concentrated in technology sector valuations alongside S&P 500's two-point-eight percent drop and Dow Jones Industrial Average's one-point-nine percent fall, creating confrontation that legal scholars and economists described as direct challenge to central bank independence codified through Federal Reserve Act provisions establishing fourteen-year terms for Board governors and four-year renewable chairman designation designed to insulate monetary policy decisions from short-term political pressures. Trump's demand for emergency fifty basis point rate cut exceeded even dovish scenarios markets had contemplated, with such magnitude typically reserved for crisis conditions like September 2001 terrorist attacks, October 2008 financial system collapse, or March 2020 pandemic outbreak, arriving instead during period when core Personal Consumption Expenditures inflation remained elevated at three-point-four percent annually, unemployment stood at three-point-seven percent near historic lows, and fourth quarter 2025 GDP expanded at annualized two-point-one percent rate, creating circumstances bearing minimal resemblance to emergencies that had justified previous aggressive Federal Reserve interventions. Powell's measured response released at fourteen-hundred hours emphasized that "The Federal Reserve's monetary policy decisions are guided exclusively by economic data, our dual mandate of maximum employment and price stability, and the longer-run inflation target of two percent," notably omitting direct acknowledgment of presidential demand while asserting institutional independence, as market reactions demonstrated complexity of investor psychology navigating between hopes for monetary accommodation supporting equity valuations and concerns about institutional integrity underpinning dollar stability essential to global financial system operations, with currency markets registering immediate worry through dollar index declining one-point-four percent while gold advanced twenty-eight dollars to two-thousand-eighty-seven per ounce as safe-haven demand reflected Federal Reserve independence credibility concerns. American households managing retirement savings through employer-sponsored 401(k) plans experienced portfolio volatility translating to eighteen hundred dollar reduction in typical balanced portfolio worth one hundred thousand dollars during February 17-18 selloff, while mortgage rates fluctuated between six-point-three and six-point-six percent creating fifty to seventy dollar monthly payment variation on median four-hundred-twenty-thousand-dollar home purchase, and retirees dependent on high-yield savings accounts offering four-point-seven percent returns faced approximately thirty dollars monthly income reduction per twenty-five basis point potential rate cut, illustrating how institutional confrontation between presidential political pressure demanding immediate accommodation and central bank technocratic independence maintaining data-dependent framework cascaded through household budgets managing retirement security, housing affordability, and consumer credit costs determining families' economic wellbeing beyond elite policy debates occurring in Washington. Disclaimer: All content on this channel is provided for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing presented should be considered financial, investment, legal, or political advice.