У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно He married his blind slave или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
The marriage certificate still exists in the Georgia State Archives—a haunting document from 1851 that records the union between plantation owner Cornelius Ashford and "Blind Ruth, property of said household." But this wasn't a love story. It was the final chapter of the most elaborate revenge plot in American history. In 1837, Ruth lost her eyesight when a Virginia plantation owner threw lye in her face. When Cornelius Ashford purchased her, he deliberately refused to buy her three children—separating a mother from her babies because keeping families together "cost too much." What Ashford didn't know was that his blind cook was far from powerless. For 13 years, Ruth built a secret network of informants, documented his financial crimes, and orchestrated his complete destruction. She manipulated his creditors into forcing him to marry her to avoid prison. And then, as his legal wife, she began slowly poisoning him with arsenic in his morning coffee. This is the true story of patience, intelligence, and a justice so perfect it looked like natural death. 📚 SOURCES & HISTORICAL CONTEXT: This story is based on historical research into antebellum slavery, documented cases of resistance, and authentic methods of 19th-century poisoning. While Ruth's specific story is a dramatic reconstruction, it represents the kinds of hidden resistance that enslaved people engaged in when legal justice was impossible. 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for more dark historical mysteries and untold stories of resistance, revenge, and justice that history tried to forget. 👍 LIKE this video if you believe sometimes justice operates outside the law. 💬 COMMENT below: Do you think Ruth's revenge was justified? Where do you draw the line between justice and murder? 🔗 SHARE with someone who loves psychological thrillers and true crime history.