Micro Four Thirds vs APS-C: Which Wins? скачать в хорошем качестве

Micro Four Thirds vs APS-C: Which Wins?

In this video, I compare images taken with two very different camera systems — the Canon 650D DSLR (APS-C) and the Olympus E-M1 Mark II mirrorless (Micro Four Thirds) — at two iconic locations in Lincoln: Ellis Mill and the two towers of Lincoln Cathedral. 📷✨ Using the Canon 650D paired with the 18-55mm kit lens, and the Olympus E-M1 Mark II with the 17mm f/1.8 prime lens, I shot each composition with care, then reviewed the RAW files side by side. The results? Surprisingly close. 🔍 Topics covered in the video: Key differences between DSLR and mirrorless systems Micro Four Thirds vs APS-C sensor performance RAW file quality and editing flexibility My thoughts on whether the camera makes a real difference 👉 Despite the technical differences — from sensor size (APS-C vs Micro Four Thirds) to autofocus systems — the final images were remarkably difficult to tell apart. This shows how, in real-world shooting, careful composition and processing can get the best out of either format. Whether you’re team DSLR, APS-C, or Micro Four Thirds mirrorless, this side-by-side comparison might just surprise you. 👍 Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and drop a comment on which image you prefer — if you can even tell them apart! -------- Social -------   / dawleylad