Hong Kong BNOs: do you satisfy the "ordinary residence" test? скачать в хорошем качестве

Hong Kong BNOs: do you satisfy the "ordinary residence" test?

Check out my UK global talent visa course for the UK here: https://courses.tom-bradford.com The duration of an absence is less important that the reason for the absence. For example, in R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal ex p Ng [1986] Imm AR 23, the subject was required to demonstrate that he had been ordinarily resident in the UK for a period of 5 years. He travelled to Hong Kong on 24 August 1967, having been ordinarily resident in the UK for 4 years 360 day. His employment ceased on 5 August 1967, but he was contracted and paid up until 31 August. The Divisional court agreed with the tribunal’s view that sine he had left the UK with no discernible intention of returning, he had ceased to be ordinarily resident at that point. Had he only intended to go to Hong Kong for a holiday, his ordinary residence would have continued. This approach is further borne out by Stransky v Stransky [1954] P 428, in which a woman was required to demonstrate that she had been ordinarily resident inEngland for the preceding 3 years. Despite overseas absences during this period of more than 15 months it was held that she had remained ordinarily resident in England. Check out my courses here: https://courses.tom-bradford.com 📧 I am happy to help with your visa and citizenship options. Please contact me through the details here: https://tom-bradford.com/contact-me/ DISCLAIMER: This video is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. It should not be used as a substitute for legal advice relating to your particular circumstances. Please note that the law may have changed since the date of this video.