Скачать с ютуб Logical Fallacies Explained в хорошем качестве

Logical Fallacies Explained

   / @thepoopieshow     / farnooshstc      / @stoicerstick   Logical Fallacies Transcript: Everyone has been in an argument at one point or another and it kinda sucks when you are starting to lose so what can you do when your opponent has the upper hand? Well you could employ these secret techniques known as logical fallacies which will allow you to spin the conversation into a direction more amenable to your position, I even have a super secret technique that I will be sharing with you at the end of the video that 60% of the time works every time. Lets start off simple with something basic that you can use in almost every situation. The NS fallacy or the non sequitur fallacy, this can allow you to quickly change the topic if you are cornered in your argument, for example you could be arguing about punishments for crime and they could hit you with a statistic or fact that destroys your whole argument, Person 1: “actually I think that violent criminals should be put to death” Person 2: “Well acktchually it says here using the Norwegian prison model we can reduce crime by 0.01% if we spend 10 gorrillion dollars” Now this is where we implement the non sequiter technique. Person 1: “that’s an interesting rebuttal but didn’t your wife leave you for a Laotian midget named requis?” Person 2: “ummm… yesh” Person 1: “I think you should be looking up the Norwegian model on how to avoid a divorce before we start getting into prison reform”. You see that? I instantly won the argument by changing the topic, and because it was also a personal attack it left him too flustered to continue and by default, I won the argument. You see? all it really takes to be a good debater is a little creativity. Up next we have the BPF (bald person fallacy), now this one is very person specific but if your opponent meets the criteria for this fallacy you can easily win the argument by using it, The BPF is the bald person fallacy, how it works is you basically just remind your opponent that they are bald and immediately you win the argument, we even have a video example of the technique in action, it’s a classic. I could give you context for the clip but honestly it doesn’t really matter, hahahahaha you can immediately see the technique work with full effect, anything the bald man said prior to the BPF was completely rendered moot, you can even go frame by frame and see the exact moment that the bald guy completely loses his . Yep slow it down riiiight about heeere, you see the small change in facial expression, the penny has dropped he was reminded of his own mortality staring back at him, the shame instantly washes over him and he becomes immediately enraged, being reminded of his own hubris, completely destroying his ego and making him look both pathetic and the loser in the natural debate. Honestly its such a perfect technique, I recommend using the bald person fallacy whenever you can because its like an exodia move, when it comes to arguments, you could be pro something evil, like rent amnesty for single mothers and I will still side with you if the other guy is bald. Honestly a great fallacy to use, even works with Norwoods, I would say anything from Norwood 4 onwards is fair game. Another one of my personal favourites is the CMS fallacy, now this one requires a little flair to make it seem convincing, the CMS fallacy or the crystal meth smoke fallacy is one that you prefferrably should only use while outside but if necessary enclosed spaces is even more effective. It starts again with you losing the argument, you then begin to start breathing heavily and telling your opponent that you might be having an asthma attack, they will then act worried and give you some time to get your quote unquote inhaler. You then catch your breath using the inhaler and one of two things can happen at this point, the opponent immediately leaves the debate stage because of the second hand fumes from your inhaler, or your opponent is also a crack fiend and will ask you for a toke, at this point you may as well forfeit the debate because the power move of asking you for a hit whilst simultaneously beating you in the marketplace of ideas is a double stroke that is hard to beat. The way to make sure that this doesn’t happen though, is that you can do a quick check to see if your opponent is missing any teeth and if they are I would advice against using this technique.