У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Boston Protest against trump, fascism, and oligarchy at Boston Common March 4, 2025 или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Protest in Boston on March 3, 2025 in favor of Democracy, The Constitution, the Rule of Law, and Human Dignity and Compassion vs. trump, the grifters, fascism, oligarchy, and the selling out of American Values. Thank you to the #50501movement and friends! On March 4, 2025, a protest took place at 4 PM on Boston Common organized in part by the "50501 Movement." This movement has been organizing "50 protests, 50 states, 1 day" actions, with a notable focus on opposing policies associated with President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, particularly Musk's influence through the ill-conceived Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and broader concerns about the great harm federal government overreach and spending cuts have done to America thus far. "Hundreds protest in Boston Common following pause on Ukraine aid, Musk layoffs," suggesting that this specific protest may have been in response to a recent pause in U.S. aid to Ukraine and layoffs linked to Musk’s initiatives or companies. This fits with the 50501 Movement’s recurring themes, as seen in prior protests like those on February 5 and February 17, 2025, which criticized Trump’s administration and Musk’s role in reshaping government efficiency, welcoming bigotry and white supremacists, lying about Project 2025—a hard-right, anti-democracy, nazi policy framework. Organizers noted aligning the date with Trump’s address to Congress. The protest was likely part of the 50501 Movement’s nationwide effort, with participants in Boston specifically protesting a combination of recent political developments—potentially the Ukraine aid pause and First Man Musk-related layoffs—while echoing broader resistance to Trump’s policies and Musk’s influence. Trump’s actions and rhetoric have been scrutinized for decades, with critics pointing to patterns they argue reflect racial bias or appeal to white supremacist sentiments: Central Park Five (1989): Trump took out full-page ads in New York newspapers calling for the execution of five Black and Latino teenagers accused of raping a white woman in Central Park. Even after DNA evidence exonerated them in 2002, Trump maintained their guilt as recently as 2016 and 2024, refusing to apologize. Critics see this as evidence of racial prejudice and a refusal to acknowledge systemic injustice against minorities. Birtherism (2011-2016): Trump was a leading voice in the false conspiracy theory that Barack Obama, the first Black U.S. president, was not born in the United States. He demanded Obama’s birth certificate and continued questioning his legitimacy even after it was produced, a stance many view as racially motivated delegitimization of a Black leader. Charlottesville Response (2017): After a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where a counter-protester was killed, Trump said there were “very fine people on both sides,” appearing to equate neo-Nazis and white nationalists with those opposing them. He later clarified that he condemned neo-Nazis, but his initial equivocation drew widespread condemnation as tacit support for white supremacist groups. Immigrant Rhetoric (2015-2024): During his 2015 campaign launch, Trump described Mexican immigrants as “rapists” and criminals, setting a tone of xenophobia. In 2024, he amplified false claims about Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, eating pets, echoing historical tropes used to dehumanize non-white groups. Critics argue this fuels nativist and racist sentiments. Policy Proposals (2025 Context): Reports indicate Trump’s second-term agenda, influenced by Project 2025, aims to reinterpret Civil Rights-era laws to focus on “anti-white racism” rather than discrimination against minorities. His supporters, 84% of whom reportedly worry about “anti-white” discrimination, see this as a defense of white identity, while detractors call it a white supremacist pivot.