Скачать с ютуб Why are Spring Controller and Service Beans Defined as Singleton Instead of Prototype? в хорошем качестве

Why are Spring Controller and Service Beans Defined as Singleton Instead of Prototype?

This guide explores the reasons why Spring framework uses singleton scope for controller and service beans instead of prototype, and its impact on Java multithreading. --- Why are Spring Controller and Service Beans Defined as Singleton Instead of Prototype? In the Spring framework, controller and service beans are defined as singleton by default. Understanding the rationale behind this design decision allows developers to better grasp the benefits and potential drawbacks when working within the framework. Singleton Scope in Spring The singleton scope in Spring means that only one instance of a bean is created per Spring ApplicationContext. This singular instance is then shared for every request and method call, ensuring that resources are conserved and shared across the application. Benefits of Singleton Scope Resource Efficiency: Since only one instance of the bean is created, the consumption of resources such as memory and CPU is minimized. Consistency: Ensures that all requests have consistent access to shared services, avoiding state-related bugs. Thread Safety: Spring manages the single instance, ensuring thread safety, provided that the developer adheres to thread-safe practices within the singleton bean. Performance: The overhead of creating new instances is removed, improving the overall performance of the application. Controller and Service Layers In a typical Spring application, the controller layer handles incoming HTTP requests and delegates them to the service layer. The service layer, in turn, handles the business logic and interacts with the data access layer. Given the critical roles these layers play, having them as singletons brings about the following advantages: Statelessness in Controllers: Controllers often need to be stateless to serve multiple HTTP requests. A singleton pattern naturally supports this statelessness. Shared Business Logic: Services usually encapsulate business logic that needs to be consistent across the application. A singleton service bean ensures that any business logic is uniformly applied. Why Not Prototype? The prototype scope creates a new instance of the bean every time it is requested. While this brings flexibility and independence of state, it comes with its own set of challenges: Increased Memory Footprint: More instances mean higher memory usage. Complex Lifecycle Management: Handling the lifecycle of multiple instances can complicate resource management. Inconsistency: There is a risk that state can become inconsistent across different instances, especially in the service layer. For these reasons, the prototype scope is generally more suited for short-lived beans and components that require statefulness, rather than controllers and services that benefit from being stateless and consistent. Handling Multithreading A common concern with singleton beans is handling multiple threads. Spring addresses this by: Thread-Safe Coding Practices: Encouraging developers to write thread-safe code within singleton beans. Synchronization: Providing synchronized access to shared resources when necessary. Thread Local Storage: Using techniques like thread-local storage to handle per-thread instances without sacrificing the benefits of singleton scope. In summary, defining controller and service beans as singleton in Spring brings significant advantages in terms of resource efficiency, consistency, and performance. Although prototype scope offers flexibility, it introduces challenges that are better avoided for these critical layers. Therefore, singleton remains the preferred choice for controllers and service beans in the Spring framework.