Why Are Chinese Cargo Planes Landing in Multan? Something Big is Happening скачать в хорошем качестве

Why Are Chinese Cargo Planes Landing in Multan? Something Big is Happening

Military modernization rarely announces itself with press conferences. It moves in cargo flights. In phased deliveries. In quiet production line images. And when it accelerates without fanfare, it signals preparation — not performance. Recent Chinese cargo aircraft landings at Multan International Airport have triggered serious analysis — not because of headlines, but because of location. Multan is not just a civilian airfield. It hosts a major Pakistan Army Aviation presence. When strategic airlift platforms arrive at a dual-use facility with military infrastructure, analysts take notice. This video breaks down why additional CAIC Z-10ME deliveries are plausible, how phased procurement cycles actually work, and why estimates of Pakistan’s operational fleet remain deliberately conservative. Defense acquisitions do not arrive in dramatic single shipments. They move in batches — integration, training, evaluation, expansion. A second batch is not confirmed. But within a six-to-seven-month cycle from initial deliveries, it is operationally realistic. We also address a critical point of misinformation: the difference between the baseline CAIC Z-10 and the ME export configuration. These are not cosmetic differences. The ME variant integrates survivability upgrades including missile approach warning systems, directed infrared countermeasures, modified exhaust routing for infrared suppression, and enhanced protection packages tailored for high-threat environments. This matters historically. In 2013, Pakistan evaluated the baseline platform and rejected it due to power and high-altitude performance limitations. The ME configuration exists because the original did not meet operational requirements. That is not speculation — that is procurement logic. The same analytical discipline applies to Pakistan’s SMASH missile. Recent official references labeling SMASH as “hypersonic” have created confusion among observers relying on older Mach 2 cruise missile assumptions. But SMASH is classified as ballistic — not cruise. Ballistic trajectories include boost, midcourse, and high-velocity reentry phases. During those phases, velocities can exceed Mach 5, meeting hypersonic criteria by definition. Comparing cruise missile speed profiles to ballistic flight physics is a categorical error. This video separates speculation from structure. It examines capability development, survivability engineering, phased acquisition cycles, and trajectory classification — without sensationalism. Because modernization that grows quietly is often the most consequential. This is not about spectacle. It is about force structure. And force structure determines deterrence. ✅⚡All Credit to the Real Owners (All images, Music, and pictures shown in the video belong to their respective owners) –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– ✅⚡ FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. The Military Curiosity Channel does not own these videos and pictures rights. Under fair use, they have been repurposed to educate and inspire others.