У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Amy Coney Barrett EXPOSES Flawed Logic in Girls' Sports Debate или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
During oral argument, Justice Amy Coney Barrett posed a pointed hypothetical to test the government’s theory on sex-separated sports teams. She asked why a cisgender boy who cannot make the boys’ team — and who demonstrably lacks any competitive advantage — would still be barred from playing on a girls’ team. Counsel responded that sex-separated teams are not based on athletic skill, but on sex-based physical differences that typically emerge through puberty. The justification, according to the argument, is to preserve equal athletic opportunities for female athletes by controlling for those differences — not to create tiers based on ability. The exchange highlights a central legal question: whether eligibility rules are grounded in biological sex, competitive advantage, or a combination of both — and who determines when that advantage no longer exists. #HearingUnsealed #SupremeCourt #AmyConeyBarrett #TitleIX #GirlsSports #OralArguments #SportsLaw #SCOTUS