Too Busy to Be Sued, Not Too Busy to Sue скачать в хорошем качестве

Too Busy to Be Sued, Not Too Busy to Sue

Can a president argue that civil litigation is too distracting to defend—while filing multiple civil lawsuits of his own? In this episode of LSAT Logic Applied, we break down a Reuters story involving Donald Trump and his claim that a sitting president should receive temporary immunity from civil lawsuits because litigation burdens the presidency. At the same time, he initiated several civil suits in his personal capacity. Using classic LSAT Logical Reasoning tools, we analyze two structural flaws: behavioral inconsistency and scope shift. Does the principle “litigation burdens the presidency” apply symmetrically? Or does the argument quietly move from protecting the office to protecting the officeholder? We also situate the issue alongside the Supreme Court’s 1997 civil immunity decision involving Bill Clinton and examine how precedent interacts with argument structure. This episode is a clean demonstration of how LSAT reasoning tools—assumptions, symmetry, and flaw analysis—translate directly into real-world legal disputes. If you want to think more clearly about how arguments work (and when they don’t), this one’s for you.