How to ID a Similar Underlying Principle of a LSAT Argument w/ LawHub Logical Reasoning Drill Set 7 скачать в хорошем качестве

How to ID a Similar Underlying Principle of a LSAT Argument w/ LawHub Logical Reasoning Drill Set 7

Watch expert #lsat tutor, Stefan Maisnier, demonstrate how to proactively identify and highlight the conclusion of a given argument and the steps of thar argument in separate colors to carefully break down the reasoning leading to that conclusion, in this case that because either an affirmative or negative outcome from an action would be useful information resulting from enacting a prescribed course of action, before seeking an answer choice that applies a similar principle of reasoning. By watching this demonstration that uses free official resources from lawhub.lsac.org, you will learn how to execute a similar style of efficient argument method identification and answer choice evaluation, focusing on qualities and quantities that do not match the structure of the given argument, using the available interface highlighting tools for future similar principle identification task #logicalreasoning questions on practice or official LSAT exams. Please like this video if you find the information in it helpful as you continue your #lsatprep journey, subscribe to this channel to receive notifications about new explanation videos as they become available, or become a member at    / @myguruedge   for early and exclusive access to additional LSAT PrepTest and LawHub Drill Set practice problem explanations. To learn more about the LSAT or the law school application process, visit the MyGuru LSAT & Law School Admissions blog at www.myguruedge.com/our-thinking/lsat-and-the-law-school-admissions-process or visit https://www.myguruedge.com/book_intro... to book a free LSAT instruction consultation. To learn more about the instructor, visit https://www.myguruedge.com/team/stefa... LSAC LawHub LSAT Logical Reasoning Drill Set 7, Question 7: Candidates running for office should pay close attention to voter survey results, because either the surveys are well-constructed, in which case candidates can learn about the populations they wish to represent, or the surveys are not well-constructed, in which case candidates can learn about the flaws in the survey procedure. 7. The principle underlying which one of the following is most similar to the principle underlying the argument above? A) Cosmetologists should pay close attention to feedback given by consumers, because whether the feedback given is positive or negative, the cosmetologists can sometimes take appropriate steps to improve their work. B) Research scientists should pay close attention to mixed experimental results, because the cause will be either that the reasoning they used to arrive at their hypothesis is incorrect, or that an assumption they make in their reasoning is incorrect. C) Employees seeking promotions should pay close attention to their supervisor's comments, because either their supervisor is unhelpful, in which case the employees can learn about difficulties in the workplace, or the supervisor is helpful in which case the employees can learn about the field in which they are trying to advance. (Correct) D) Students trying to pass a class generally pay close attention to their professor's comments, because either their professor is encouraging, in which case students who want to learn can keep trying, or their professor is discouraging, in which case students who do not want to learn can consider dropping the class. E) Artists seeking national exposure should pay close attention to published criticism, because a critic either misunderstands an artist's work, in which case the artist can shrug it off, or the critic understands the work, in which case either a positive or a negative review will serve to draw attention to the art itself.