Fury As Taxi Driver Paralyses Cyclist, Receives 19-week Suspended Sentence скачать в хорошем качестве

Fury As Taxi Driver Paralyses Cyclist, Receives 19-week Suspended Sentence

A 66-year-old taxi driver jumped a red light in Burslem, Stoke-on-Trent, hit a cyclist, and left him paralysed from the chest down. He didn’t go to prison. This is not an isolated tragedy — it’s a mirror held up to Britain’s road culture. We talk about “sharing the road” as though cars and bikes stand on equal footing, but every statistic, every courtroom, every newspaper headline says otherwise. When a cyclist breaks a rule, it’s national outrage. When a driver smashes through a red light and destroys a life, it’s a “tragic accident.” The moral scales are permanently tilted toward the people in cars — and this story proves it. The driver, Khalid Mohammed, admitted causing serious injury by dangerous driving. The court heard how his impatience at a set of traffic lights in September 2024 changed another human being’s future forever. The cyclist will need lifelong care. His family’s world has collapsed around him. Yet the sentence? Two years suspended, a driving ban, and 240 hours of unpaid work. If the roles were reversed — if a cyclist had jumped a red and paralysed a driver — the media would go nuclear. Front-page fury. Phone-ins demanding mandatory insurance and number plates for cyclists. Politicians racing to draft new restrictions. But a motorist does it, and the machine grinds on as if nothing happened. That’s why this channel exists. To show that the problem isn’t “bad cyclists.” It’s a system that excuses dangerous driving while blaming the people most likely to die from it. Roads are designed for speed, not safety. The legal framework treats driving as a right, not a responsibility. And our culture — soaked in car advertising and motonormativity — keeps telling us that accidents “just happen.” They don’t. They’re decisions. They’re the predictable outcomes of policy, design, and attitude. Every red light jumped in a car is a roll of the dice with someone else’s life. Every shrug from the justice system signals that those lives don’t matter as much as keeping traffic flowing. The victim in Burslem is now in a wheelchair for life. The driver who did it will be driving again in two years. We need a system that protects people, not speed limits. That values human life above convenience. That treats a driving licence as a privilege to be earned, not a birthright to be reclaimed after a suspension. So next time you hear someone moaning about “lycra louts” or “entitled cyclists,” remember this: it isn’t cyclists leaving people paralysed and walking free. It’s the people behind the wheel, backed by a culture that refuses to hold them truly accountable. Britain’s roads don’t need another awareness campaign. They need justice.