• ClipSaver
  • dtub.ru
ClipSaver
Русские видео
  • Смешные видео
  • Приколы
  • Обзоры
  • Новости
  • Тесты
  • Спорт
  • Любовь
  • Музыка
  • Разное
Сейчас в тренде
  • Фейгин лайф
  • Три кота
  • Самвел адамян
  • А4 ютуб
  • скачать бит
  • гитара с нуля
Иностранные видео
  • Funny Babies
  • Funny Sports
  • Funny Animals
  • Funny Pranks
  • Funny Magic
  • Funny Vines
  • Funny Virals
  • Funny K-Pop

Strengthening the Second Amendment | D.C. v. Heller скачать в хорошем качестве

Strengthening the Second Amendment | D.C. v. Heller 7 лет назад

скачать видео

скачать mp3

скачать mp4

поделиться

телефон с камерой

телефон с видео

бесплатно

загрузить,

Не удается загрузить Youtube-плеер. Проверьте блокировку Youtube в вашей сети.
Повторяем попытку...
Strengthening the Second Amendment | D.C. v. Heller
  • Поделиться ВК
  • Поделиться в ОК
  •  
  •  


Скачать видео с ютуб по ссылке или смотреть без блокировок на сайте: Strengthening the Second Amendment | D.C. v. Heller в качестве 4k

У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Strengthening the Second Amendment | D.C. v. Heller или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать mp3 с ютуба отдельным файлом. Бесплатный рингтон Strengthening the Second Amendment | D.C. v. Heller в формате MP3:


Если кнопки скачивания не загрузились НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru



Strengthening the Second Amendment | D.C. v. Heller

I wrote a new book all about the Supreme Court. Order your copy here: http://amzn.to/45Wzhur Patreon:   / iammrbeat   Mr. Beat's band: http://electricneedleroom.net/ Mr. Beat on Twitter:   / beatmastermatt   In episode 27 of Supreme Court Briefs, a gun ban in the District of Columbia gets challenged, and the Supreme Court seriously looks at the 2nd amendment for the first time in nearly 70 years. Check out cool primary sources here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/07-290 Other sources used: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distric... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm... http://lawcenter.giffords.org/gun-law... https://www.thetrace.org/2016/03/dick... https://www.britannica.com/event/Dist... https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/... http://reason.com/archives/2008/11/18... https://www.huffingtonpost.com/sanfor... https://www.wnycstudios.org/story/gun... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/m... Photo credits: Slowking4 Music credits: Jermaine Hysten Robert A. Levy of the libertarian think tank the Cato Institute, seeks to challenge a DC law that made it illegal to possess handguns, automatic guns, or high capacity semi-automatic guns. In fact, the law, which had been effect since 1976, said DC residents couldn’t even keep them in their own homes. Levy tries to find DC residents to sue the city, based on his argument that the gun ban went against the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Levy would fund the whole thing. He found six residents with various backgrounds who agreed to sue, among them Shelly Parker, a software designer who wanted a gun to defend herself against violent drug dealers in her neighborhood. Levy chose her to be the leading plaintiff. Also among the plaintiffs was a dude named Dick Heller. Heller was a licensed police officer who got to carry a gun for his security job guarding federal buildings, yet it was illegal for him to have a gun in his own home. Heller was passionately against the gun ban and spent years fighting it, even previously going to the National Rifle Association, or NRA, in attempt to sue the city. The NRA had declined. In district court, Levy and his plaintiffs had no success. In fact, District Court Judge Ricardo Urbina dismissed the lawsuit. However, the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit reversed that dismissal, saying D.C.’s gun ban was unconstitutional. The Court argued that the Second Amendment “protects an individual right to keep and bear arms.” They also argued that right existed before the Constitution existed, and that the idea of owning a gun was that it could be used for things like hunting and self-defense. Not only self-defense from intruders to the home, but even tyrannical governments. Woah. Man, bold statements there. Oh yeah, they also said the only plaintiff who could claim damage, though, was Dick Heller, who apparently was the only one who had applied for a handgun permit but was rejected. The District of Columbia appealed to the Supreme Court, and Heller was like, “yeah, please do.” You see, the Supreme Court had kept pretty silent on The Second Amendment throughout American history. In fact, it hadn’t even considered the true meaning of the Second Amendment for about 70 years, so when it agreed to hear the case on November 20, 2007, it was certainly historic, which is why I guess I’m making a video about this case. I mean, duh, Mr. Beat. Anyway, the Court heard oral arguments on March 18, 2008. The big question was “Did the DC law restricting access to guns kept in the home go against the Second Amendment?” The Court said “yes.” On June 26, 2008, it announced it had sided with Heller. It was 5-4. The Court argued the Second Amendment wasn’t just about having a well-regulated militia, and that the term “militia” wasn’t just those serving in the military. They said the Second Amendment was also about individuals having the right to have weapons to defend themselves. So this part was independent from this part. So banning guns commonly used for protection violated the Second Amendment. However, the Court added that the Second Amendment is not unlimited. Not everyone should be able to get a weapon. It wasn’t a right to have a weapon whenever or for whatever purpose. And the type of weapon mattered. Extremely dangerous weapons, not commonly used for hunting or self defense could be banned. Really, most of the arguments revolved around the self-defense argument.

Comments
  • How A Kid Bringing a Gun to School Led to the Federal Government Losing Power | U.S. v. Lopez 2 года назад
    How A Kid Bringing a Gun to School Led to the Federal Government Losing Power | U.S. v. Lopez
    Опубликовано: 2 года назад
  • AR-16: Armalite's Lost Battle Rifle 3 часа назад
    AR-16: Armalite's Lost Battle Rifle
    Опубликовано: 3 часа назад
  • Can You Burn An American Flag? | Texas v. Johnson 8 лет назад
    Can You Burn An American Flag? | Texas v. Johnson
    Опубликовано: 8 лет назад
  • Protecting Extreme Speech | Snyder v. Phelps 1 год назад
    Protecting Extreme Speech | Snyder v. Phelps
    Опубликовано: 1 год назад
  • Can the Police Use Evidence They Got Illegally? | Mapp v. Ohio 7 лет назад
    Can the Police Use Evidence They Got Illegally? | Mapp v. Ohio
    Опубликовано: 7 лет назад
  • When Can Speech Be Banned? | Schenck v. United States 3 года назад
    When Can Speech Be Banned? | Schenck v. United States
    Опубликовано: 3 года назад
  • How the Supreme Court Made It Easier to Get a Gun | McDonald v. Chicago 1 год назад
    How the Supreme Court Made It Easier to Get a Gun | McDonald v. Chicago
    Опубликовано: 1 год назад
  • What Sam Altman Doesn't Want You To Know 3 дня назад
    What Sam Altman Doesn't Want You To Know
    Опубликовано: 3 дня назад
  • Between SMG and PDW: Sweden's CBJ-MS 2 дня назад
    Between SMG and PDW: Sweden's CBJ-MS
    Опубликовано: 2 дня назад
  • Is the Death Penalty Illegal?!? | Gregg v. Georgia 4 года назад
    Is the Death Penalty Illegal?!? | Gregg v. Georgia
    Опубликовано: 4 года назад
  • Why YouTube Can Exist | Sony v. Universal 7 лет назад
    Why YouTube Can Exist | Sony v. Universal
    Опубликовано: 7 лет назад
  • Is Gun Ownership a Right? | 5 Minute Video 8 лет назад
    Is Gun Ownership a Right? | 5 Minute Video
    Опубликовано: 8 лет назад
  • How the Supreme Court Decided the 2000 Election | Bush v. Gore 7 лет назад
    How the Supreme Court Decided the 2000 Election | Bush v. Gore
    Опубликовано: 7 лет назад
  • Worst 10 Supreme Court Justices 1 год назад
    Worst 10 Supreme Court Justices
    Опубликовано: 1 год назад
  • Same-Sex Marriage Becomes Legal | Obergefell v. Hodges 8 лет назад
    Same-Sex Marriage Becomes Legal | Obergefell v. Hodges
    Опубликовано: 8 лет назад
  • What Was The Biggest Upgrade In The History Of U.S. Military Rifles? 5 дней назад
    What Was The Biggest Upgrade In The History Of U.S. Military Rifles?
    Опубликовано: 5 дней назад
  • Why Does the U.S. Have Birthright Citizenship? | United States v. Wong Kim Ark 7 лет назад
    Why Does the U.S. Have Birthright Citizenship? | United States v. Wong Kim Ark
    Опубликовано: 7 лет назад
  • Abortion Is Illegal Again | Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization 2 дня назад
    Abortion Is Illegal Again | Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
    Опубликовано: 2 дня назад
  • Махинации Верховного суда!!! 5 лет назад
    Махинации Верховного суда!!!
    Опубликовано: 5 лет назад
  • The Supreme Court Case That Changed the Fate of American Workers For Decades | Lochner v. New York 2 года назад
    The Supreme Court Case That Changed the Fate of American Workers For Decades | Lochner v. New York
    Опубликовано: 2 года назад

Контактный email для правообладателей: [email protected] © 2017 - 2025

Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer Правообладателям - DMCA Условия использования сайта - TOS



Карта сайта 1 Карта сайта 2 Карта сайта 3 Карта сайта 4 Карта сайта 5