У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно "Prolife" Madonnas vs. Socially Independent "Wh-res": Internalizing the Madonna Wh-re Complex или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
PART 3 of the Madonna Wh-re Series: How the Internalization of the MWC Politically Motivates Women Against Our Basic Human Rights Coco explores how the Madonna Wh-re social archetypes are leveraged to mobilize women against abortion healthcare and our rights to self determination through physical, economic, and social autonomy. This complex is the embodiment of patriarchy dividing and conquering women. Patriarchal beliefs divide all women into 2 archetypes - the Madonnas and the Wh-res - to encourage women to compete against each other as threats instead of standing in solidarity for mutual rights and benefits as men do. Coco debunks the “prolife” myths to show that anti-choice views are a vehicle for Madonna archetypes to perform their patriarchal “purity” by politically punishing women (Wh-re archetypes) who choose to live outside of patriarchal codependence. Ultimately, these Madonna archetypes are motivated to punish Wh-re archetypes for refusing to restrict their sexual and creative capacities to serving a man as a desireless resource (and material dependent) via becoming wife property status. From the perspective of evolutionary psychology, the Madonna strategy of mobilizing against women’s basic rights to abortion healthcare, self-determination, and social independence is a defensive maneuver. Unmarried women are unclaimed women, meaning the Madonna is vulnerable to losing her husband/master should he seek to abandon her to pursue another woman. Within patriarchal culture, men only respect other men, so the Madonna’s material stability is threatened by the existence of unmarried women. An unmarried woman has no man to claim ownership of her body, sexuality, creative powers, and reproductive capacity. Therefore, there is no man present to deter the Madonna’s husband/master from seeking to use her outside of his marriage. As we’ve discussed, within patriarchal beliefs, women scapegoat other women for the choices and actions of men. The Madonna’s abdication of independence means she has no power to hold her husband/master accountable for his choices. Instead, she instead seeks to enact as high of a cost as possible against the existence of unmarried women to limit potential sexual rivals. The Madonna is not motivated by the actual choices or lifestyles of the Wh-re archetypes - it is the mere existence of socially independent women that motivates their political desire to punish women who do not submit to patriarchal codependence via marriage. In this way, we’re dealing with Schrodinger’s Wh-re. Regardless of whether the Wh-re archetype is celibate by choice and spiritual devotion, or a lesbian, or actually sleeping with men indiscriminately - the Madonna is motivated to politically harm Wh-re archetypes for refusing to be a man’s wife property. The point of attacking women’s rights is to make it as costly and dangerous as possible for OTHER women to live outside of wife property status, to limit the potential threat of a Madonna's husband cheating on her or abandoning her for another woman. CHECK OUT THE LAST VIDEOS OF THIS SERIES for a deep dive into the psychological dynamics underpinning how men experience the Madonna Wh-re Complex as love without sex and sex without love. LIKE AND SUBSCRIBE FOR WEEKLY VIDEOS! FREE ARTICLES: PowerCultureCoco.Substack.com TikTok - CocoHasIdeas IG - PowerCultureCoco WORKS CITED: https://www.npr.org/2022/08/18/111134... https://www.texastribune.org/2024/11/... https://www.texastribune.org/2024/10/... https://www.propublica.org/article/te... https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx... https://time.com/7306009/tennessee-pr... https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/20...