Lawyer Uses ChatGPT For Legal Research, It Goes Horribly Wrong скачать в хорошем качестве

Lawyer Uses ChatGPT For Legal Research, It Goes Horribly Wrong

In this video, we’ll look at recent groundbreaking developments in the world of law and Artificial Intelligence that have the potential to shape the way technology is used in our justice system. BECOME A CHANNEL MEMBER:    / thelegalpad   Chapters: 00:00 - Introduction 00:12 - Background Facts 00:40 - Lawyer Cites Fake Case Law 01:02 - Opposing Lawyer Flags Fake Cases 01:46 - Judge Investigates the Matter 02:41 - Lawyer Files Fake Court Opinions 03:45 - Judge Threatens Sanctions 05:40 - Lawyer Admits Using ChatGPT 07:46 - Lawyer Confronts ChatGPT 12:06 - Judge Creates First Ever "AI Pledge" 15:08 - Key Takeaway #1 17:00 - Key Takeaway #2 17:18 -Key Takeaway #3 17:28 - Fate of Lawyer Who Used ChaptGPT First, we’ll review the federal lawsuit Mata v. Avianca, Inc., in which plaintiff Roberto Mata sued the Colombian airline company for personal injuries allegedly caused by a flight attendant. The airline defendant in that case filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff's case. We'll look at eight questionable citations to "case law" that the plaintiff's attorney cited in his response. Next, we'll look at the defendant's reply in which they called attention to the fact that a number of the cases cited in the plaintiff's response did not seem to exist. After that, we'll review several orders from the court concerning the matter as it unraveled what had happened. We'll also hear from the plaintiff's attorneys, who ultimately admitted to using ChatGPT to research case law. ChatGPT not only fabricated the citations to cases that do not exist, it fabricated entire quotations from those cases that the plaintiff's lawyer then used in support of his arguments. To make matters worse, when ordered by the court to attach copies of the questionable opinions that he had cited, the plaintiff's lawyer attached entire legal opinions. We'll look at one of the fabricated opinions that the attorney attached to his affidavit. Next, we'll discuss how one federal judge has responded to this incident by creating the first ever "Generative AI Certification" that all lawyers appearing in his court must sign at the outset of their case. At the end of the video, I'll answer several questions you may have and then share my thoughts on the implications that this ordeal may have on our legal system going forward. SUBSCRIBE:    / @legalpadlaw   WAGONER LAW FIRM: https://wagonerlawfirmpllc.com/ #chatgpt #law #lawyer NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER: The information in this video and on this Channel is not legal advice or any other form of professional advice. It's for informational/educational purposes only. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of it does not create, an attorney-client relationship. Nothing in this video or on this channel should be taken as legal advice or any other form of professional advice for any individual claim, case, or situation. You should seek advice from an attorney or other professional regarding your specific situation. Contacting the Wagoner Law Firm does not create an attorney-client relationship, nor does your receipt of an initial case evaluation. The only way to create an attorney-client relationship with the Wagoner Law Firm is through a mutual written agreement, which you will be asked to sign. Please do not send any confidential information to the Wagoner Law Firm until an attorney-client relationship has been established. This description may contain one or more affiliate links, meaning that I will earn a financial benefit if you click through and use an affiliate link (at no additional cost to you).