Русские видео

Сейчас в тренде

Иностранные видео


Скачать с ютуб J Sai Deepak Heated Debate with Anas Tanwir " Give Back all 40,000 Temples , kashi & adina masjid " в хорошем качестве

J Sai Deepak Heated Debate with Anas Tanwir " Give Back all 40,000 Temples , kashi & adina masjid " 9 месяцев назад


Если кнопки скачивания не загрузились НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru



J Sai Deepak Heated Debate with Anas Tanwir " Give Back all 40,000 Temples , kashi & adina masjid "

💰 kindly consider supporting our YT Team - https://pages.razorpay.com/supportcle... Your contributions help us Fund in Spreading the Word to More people ! 🙏 🚀 Don't Want to miss any Video updates ? 💬 Join WhatsApp & Telegram Community - ✅ WhatsApp Channel Link - https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaJ3... ✅ Telegram Community Link - https://t.me/clearcuttalksdiscussion Video Credits - Original Owner of the Video Decoding Bharat: Hinduism, Citizenship & The Future of India (Heated Debate!) *Can Muslims be truly Indian? Is Bharat just another word for India?* This intense debate tackles controversial issues surrounding national identity, religious rights, and the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in India. *J Sai Deepak, a lawyer, and Anas Tanwir, a Supreme Court advocate, go head-to-head on the following:* The definition of "Bharat" and its connection to Hinduism. The CAA's impact on Muslim minorities and its constitutionality. Historical events like Partition and their influence on citizenship rights. The concept of Dharma and its role in Indian society. Whether a Uniform Civil Code is necessary for national unity. *This video is a must-watch for anyone interested in:* Indian politics and social issues The CAA debate and its implications The evolving concept of Indian citizenship Interfaith relations in India The future of Bharat --- In this impassioned debate between J Sai Deepak and Anas Tanwir, the discussion delves into the historical and political complexities surrounding the partition of India in 1947. J Sai Deepak argues that India bears a civilizational duty towards Hindus and Sikhs who remained in Pakistan post-partition, referencing historical agreements like the Nehru-Liaquat Pact aimed at safeguarding minorities. He criticizes Pakistan for allegedly failing to uphold these commitments, leading to precarious conditions for non-Muslim minorities such as Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, and others in Pakistan today. Anas Tanwir responds by questioning the extent of India's obligation and the practicality of enforcing such agreements in the present context. He emphasizes the need to move beyond historical grievances and focus on current diplomatic relations between India and Pakistan. The debate touches on sensitive topics such as the treatment of religious minorities in Pakistan, the constitutional frameworks governing citizenship in both countries, and the broader implications for bilateral relations. The conversation becomes heated at times, reflecting the deep emotional and political stakes involved in discussing these issues. J Sai Deepak stresses the moral imperative of protecting minority rights, while Anas Tanwir advocates for a more pragmatic approach in addressing contemporary challenges. Their exchange underscores the ongoing relevance of partition-era agreements in shaping India-Pakistan relations and the protection of religious minorities across borders. --- *Keywords:* Bharat, India, Hinduism, CAA, Citizenship, Muslim Rights, J Sai Deepak, Anas Tanwir, Debate, Nationalism, Religion, Constitution [Disclaimer] ⭐ This video has been reposted for educational and informational purposes . All credit for the creation of this content goes to its original owner . We do not claim ownership of any materials used in the making of this video . If you are the rightful owner of the content and wish for it to be removed or credited differently, please contact us immediately. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation .

Comments