Bond Safety Standards - Ep. 9 скачать в хорошем качестве

Bond Safety Standards - Ep. 9

In this episode of Capital Allocation Lab, we continue Security Analysis (Chapter 9) and build a practical framework for judging whether a bond deserves “fixed‑value investment” status. We focus on what actually protects a bondholder: the issuer’s ability to meet all obligations through a full cycle, not just a comforting label like “secured” or “short maturity”. Timecodes 00:00 Short‑term ≠ safe: the maturity myth (cold open) 00:56 Welcome to Capital Allocation Lab & mission 01:27 Subscribe & like (support free lessons) 02:11 Roadmap: provisions, maturity, record, coverage 03:20 Provisions of the issue: bonds are legal contracts 04:59 Secured vs unsecured: why collateral isn’t the whole story 07:20 Cash flow pays coupons (don’t underwrite liquidation) 09:15 Income bonds: “bonds” that behave like equity 10:10 Maturity & refinancing risk: why near-term can be dangerous 13:22 When short‑term can be safe: the liquidity test 14:26 Short vs long maturities: the mispricing trap 16:16 Payment record & municipal credit: default vs rehabilitation 18:53 Dividend & buybacks: payout policy and creditor safety 21:53 Earnings coverage: the core quantitative test 22:36 The “prior deductions” coverage trick (and why it misleads) 25:29 The right way: total fixed charges (“over‑all” coverage) 27:42 Minimum coverage anchors (utilities ~1.75x / rails ~2x / industrials ~3x) 29:00 Full‑cycle averaging: 7–12 years & deficit‑year handling 31:15 Worked example: 10‑year coverage (2.2x vs ~6x) 34:04 Coupon rates & interest rates: safety vs price risk 37:44 Practical checklist: evaluate any bond step‑by‑step 40:35 Final recap: the six takeaways 41:49 Thanks + what concept should we tackle next? What you’ll learn How bond provisions and seniority matter, and why “secured vs. unsecured” is not the whole story Why short maturity can increase risk through refinancing pressure, and when short‑term debt can be genuinely safer Why dividend history can mislead bond investors, and how payout policy affects creditor safety The right way to calculate interest coverage (avoid the prior‑deductions trap; use total fixed charges) Minimum coverage anchors by business stability (utilities vs. railroads vs. industrials) and how to think in today’s terms Why multi‑year averages beat rigid year‑by‑year rules, especially across recessions How coupon rate and interest‑rate changes affect both safety and principal value Key citations from Chapter 9 (to anchor the big ideas) New York savings‑bank legal‑investment standards (mortgage vs. debenture eligibility; earnings and dividend tests) Securities Act of 1933 and the shift away from misleading “prior‑deductions” coverage presentations Discussion of municipal credit analysis references: Hastings Lyon, Investment (1926); Badger & Guthmann, Investment: Principles and Practices (rev. ed., 1936) Proceedings of the Conference on Bond Portfolios (New York State Bankers Association, 1939) Investment Standards and Procedure (American Bankers Association, Bank Management Commission booklet No. 19, 1937) A. M. Hillhouse, Municipal Bonds: A Century of Experience (1936) Dividend “bond‑legal” incentives discussed with historical references including testimony and reporting (e.g., New York Times, Dec. 3, 1936; Dewing, Financial Policy of Corporations) Historical bond price sensitivity example referenced via the Dow‑Jones bond price index decline (1917–1920) Who this is for Disciplined, long‑term, fundamentals‑minded investors (approx. 35–65) who value timeless analysis over hype — readers of classic investing books, fans of Buffett’s letters, and owner‑operators focused on decision quality. Disclaimer Educational content only. Not individualized investment, legal, tax, or accounting advice.