У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Identify an Assumption (Executive Assessment – Critical Reasoning Tactics – Common Question Tasks) или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Master the Identify an Assumption task for the Executive Assessment (EA) Critical Reasoning section. In this lesson, we cover exam logistics, timing strategy, how to spot assumption prompts, the argumentation equation (premise → assumption → conclusion), common assumption types (analogy, representation, data interpretation, causality, plans/recommendations), and the Negation Test with worked examples. Perfect for EA candidates aiming to boost verbal accuracy and pacing. AnalystPrep Executive Assessment® Course can be found at https://analystprep.com/shop/executiv... AnalystPrep GMAT® Course can be found at https://analystprep.com/shop/gmat-lea... Question Logistics Assume 3-5 Critical Reasonings in 14 Question Verbal Section Assume 1-3 Critical Reasonings in Each Seven Question Half Single Paragraph Pertaining to a Unique Question Task Strategic Best Practices Assume 2min30 per Question Average Maximum 3min00 for Any Question Note Task of Question Before Engaging Prompt Consider Skipping Critical Reasonings on First Pass Through a Half to Ensure You See All Questions Take Targeted Notes to Force Engagement and Proactively Address Specific Question Task Primary Question Format to Guess and Skip in Second Half if less than 15min Remaining After Question 7 Recognizing Identify an Assumption Tasks Identify Reference to an Argument or Recommendation in Question Stem Note Task Words Such as “Assumption” “Assumes” “Depends” Beware of Considering Assumption Tasks as Equivalent to Strengthen Strategic Implications Requires Close Consideration of the Details of the Argument Recognize that “Extremes” Can be Necessary Assumptions Attempt to Categorically Identify the Type of Argument to Broadly Predict Possible Assumptions Consider Using the Negation Test if Down to Two or Three Possible Answer Choices Some Wrong Answers Go Too Far About What is Necessary Eliminate More Quickly if a Choice Closely Matches Prediction Identifying Assumptions in an Argument Try to Predict Specifically Based on the Type of Argument What Must be - True to Reasonably Believe Conclusion Based on Given Premise Properly Categorizing an Argument Helps to Focus on Details that May Indicate Otherwise Overlooked Leaps in Logic Analogy | A = B Assumption – Items in argument are comparable in relevant ways Representation Assumption – Evidentiary sample is representative of the larger whole Data and Evidence Interpretation Assumption – No other reasonable interpretation of data or evidence Causality | A implies B Assumption – No other possible causes or outcomes, and that the circumstance is not merely a coincidence Plan or Recommendation Assumption – Execution and approach will work Negation Test for Assumptions Step 1 Work Problem as Normal Reaching Two or Three Options by Eliminating Choices Against Proactively Predicted Assumption Step 2 Take a Remaining Answer Choice and Negate its Impact by Adding or Removing Word “Not” or by Applying a Technically Opposite Quantity Step 3 Apply Negated Information from Choice to Determine Impact of Negation on Viability of the Conclusion Step 4 If Nothing Changes in Argument or Argument Strengthens Upon Negation of Choice Eliminate as Not Necessary for Conclusion If Argument Fails Upon Applying Negation of the Choice Select as Negated Fail Indicating that Affirmative is Necessary for Conclusion Identify an Assumption Task Checklist Step 1 Note an Identify an Assumption Task by Recognizing Key Indicator Terms and the Presence of an Argument with a Main Conclusion Step 2 Read Prompt as Written Paying Close Attention to Type of Information Provided in Premise and Note Explicit Conclusion Step 3 If Common Argument Identified – More Specifically Predict What a Categorical Assumption in the Argument may be Based on Premise If No Common Argument Identified – Use Generic Prediction “Find What Must be True to Believe Conclusion that...” Step 4 Eliminate Choices Against Prediction Using Common Wrong Answer Reasons and Apply Negation Test as Needed for Final 2-3 Options 0:00 Introduction 0:16 Critical Reasonings 3:22 Argumentation Equation 4:34 Common Argument Assumptions 9:14 Negation Test for Assumptions 10:55 Technical Quantities 13:09 Identify an Assumption Tasks 17:29 Identify an Assumption Task Checklist #ExecutiveAssessment #CriticalReasoning #Assumption #NegationTest #EAVerbal #TestPrep #AnalystPrep #Logic #Reasoning #ExamStrategy