Supreme Court: Social Media not liable for ISIS Attack (Twitter v. Taamneh) скачать в хорошем качестве

Supreme Court: Social Media not liable for ISIS Attack (Twitter v. Taamneh)

The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that Google, Twitter, and Facebook are not liable for terrorist attacks by way of hosting ISIS social media accounts. #supremecourt #lawreview #socialmedia Thanks for all of your support! Please consider supporting on Patreon.com/ljfrench, through YouTube membership, or Floatplane subscription. May supporters: "Counselor" Level: Eevi, Ugly Grill, torpedan, PureMagma, Eric Tams, TechTechPotato, Gutbrodj, King Aires, The Blood Soaked Survivors, Kyle Siefring, Don't credit or shoutout this account "Advocate" Level: Arron Washington, Keith Marrocco, Dustin Rodriguez, Josué Vicioso, Brian Flowers, tdis8629, Meaningless, amelius, Aethero Toland, John Swanson, matthew beller, Priscilla Astling, Schi-Schi, EvoGamer, Kreachers, admalledd, Dawn Massaro Guy, khagerou, ChessWithADHD, wrozmo, robfrawley, Medeka, Guy Chapman, David Zaslavsky, Christian Ullrich, Brian Roush, Rudolph Bescherer Jr, Firstname Mclastname, JH, Cindy Campbell, Tron Bårdgård, Mark Randall, Sarah Gerweck, Matthew East, Mario Bonales, Ian McDonald, Marcus Agehall, Jonathan Robillard, Amanda Gillies, Justin Waddell, Nathaniel, Tony Cruickshank, Kasaryth, Oisin Creaner, Stefan Persson, Alexander Sihn, Andrew Reid, Gregory Ford, Brody Eastwood, sehro, Dzyan, Chris Lindsay, Rico Robbins, Kai Raphahn, Andrew "FastLizard4" Adams, Kean, Jessica Pearson, LbxAni, Daniel Ducharme, Ph.D., majikthise, foonix, TheEuphoGuy, Brian, Matthew Bertrand, Jack Draak, Eye_Make_Stuff, Scott F. Comstock, James Melanson, Kat Willhite, DreamerDon, Alan Nise, anton.molyboha, itheoryon, The Disturbed Angel, Eric Woodley, Raindrop Works, Logan Stromberg, scj643, eyebrows360, Chris Connett, Michael Ciesielski, Chris Hilliard, Travus, Greg, Eric Barker, Gef the Mongoose, keeping up with the Devilment on weekends, toadbear, Q Squared, Jason Glaesemann, DrJKL, Lawrence Groupe, Michael, DrakeDT, Andrew Venier, Bill Tonnies, Rabid Ronin, Thomas Dinsdale-Young, Katrina Middleton, Zendane, varia, jag1110, Bill Somerville, Mike Dunford, Peter Huston, AnnoyedRook, cwestpha, rcmaehl, James Oxford, Michael Stokes-Byrne, c, Jorge Vittes, Nate Gray, Tony Webster, Evan Davis, Deleted, Ross, Dustin Bosveld, ChaoQueen, Tymorus, Bryan Lubeck, Rovert09, PinkFluffyTeddyBear, Ivan Chepurnyi, Rodney Nelson, Thedougler303, Rob Voisey, jak_ub, WarrantyVoid, Kris Hetzel, Negligibly Negative, Maarten Wisman, Christina B, Robert Z, sean murphy, RunsWhenChased, ricin, OsculatingPlane, Landon Noll, Fubar, Ryan Schott, RipeSloth, CostlyFiddle, Jennifer and David Brock, void, RenyPetty, Blueberry Hill, Andrew, Aaron Harvey, Learethak, Emily, Dave Meyers, TheAmazingDave, jsteelkw, Zoonist, Laura Hertzman, Rita Loy, XPEric, balayanr, zensalad, Wolfendragoon, Nova_, MeDeOgre, Kantorock, Ava-, Deleted, jSON, Jabberwoky69, Deleted, Bee Geiger, Laura Hertzman, God 420 00:00 - Start 01:37 - The Taamneh Opinion: Introduction 03:25 - I: Factual Background 09:34 - We are here on a Motion to Dismiss 12:12 - II: The law - 18 U.S.C. 2333 14:31 - III: Analysis - 2333 15:29 - Halberstam v. Welch - aiding and abetting 21:16 - Applying Halberstam 22:05 - Aiding and Abetting Common-law 35:39 - IV: Applying Halberstam to Taamneh 45:52 - The Ninth Circuit's Ruling 49:51 - The Google Case 51:36 - V. Conclusions 53:28 - Justice Jackson's Concurrence 54:46 - Leonard Thoughts