Were 15 Books Really Removed from the Bible? | The Ethiopian Bible Explained скачать в хорошем качестве

Were 15 Books Really Removed from the Bible? | The Ethiopian Bible Explained

Did powerful leaders remove books from the Bible to control what people believe? This claim appears everywhere online—but the real history of the Bible is far more complex, nuanced, and fascinating than most conspiracy theories suggest. In this video, we explore why the Ethiopian Orthodox Bible contains 81 books, compared to the 66 books in most Protestant Bibles and the 73 books in Catholic Bibles—and why this difference is not the result of a secret plot, but of diverse historical traditions in early Christianity. 🔍 In this video, you’ll learn: Why early Christianity never had a single, universal biblical canon The historical role of debated texts like The Book of Enoch, Jubilees, The Shepherd of Hermas, and The Apocalypse of Peter What the Council of Nicaea and Council of Chalcedon actually decided—and what they did not How the Ethiopian Orthodox Church developed its biblical tradition largely independent of Rome and Constantinople The difference between historical evidence, religious tradition, and modern interpretation This video is not about exposing a conspiracy. It’s about understanding how the Bible was formed, how different Christian communities preserved scripture, and why diversity in biblical canons existed long before modern denominations. The additional books preserved in Ethiopia do not replace the Gospels or overturn core Christian beliefs, but they do help us better understand early Jewish and Christian thought, angelology, apocalyptic literature, and theological debates in the first centuries of Christianity. 👉 If you’re interested in: Bible history Early Christianity Lost books of the Bible Biblical canon explained Ethiopian Orthodox Christianity The Book of Enoch explained …this video is for you. 📌 Watch with an open mind. Ask thoughtful questions. Seek historical understanding—not sensational answers. True depth comes from examining evidence, context, and multiple traditions—not from simplified narratives.