Bernardo Kastrup on Objections to Analytic Idealism and Much More! скачать в хорошем качестве

Bernardo Kastrup on Objections to Analytic Idealism and Much More!

Timestamps 00:00 Intro 01:30 The “locked in” objection 11:22 New Mysterianism and the expansion of definitions 16:28 Materialists and “absurdism” 17:45 G.E. Moore and Bertrand Russell’s “refutation” of idealism 28:14 F.H. Bradley on Russell and Moore 32:19 Follow up on epistemological idealism 35:16 Does analytic idealism rest on indirect realism? 36:36 Wave function monism, reductionism, and decoherence 44:44 Observation does NOT cause collapse of the wave function 50:00 Hoffman’s conscious realism vs. Bernardo’s analytic idealism? 54:14 Is analytic idealism falsifiable? 01:02:39 Decreased brain activity = more experience? 01:07:04 Bernardo vs. ChatGPT and the media 01:17:03 Bernardo on academia 01:18:48 Bones, fossils, and mummies? 01:21:55 The universal mind and meta-consciousness 01:34:51 More than allegory and perennialism 01:41:22 Resurrection and myth 01:59:44 The universal mind and God 02:08:28 Analytic idealism and Near Death Experiences (NDE’s) 02:21:02 Materialism will NOT be mainstream 02:26:00 The multiverse? 02:31:26 Fine tuning? 02:41:53 Break and Monistic Idealism on science 02:44:00 Return and Bernardo on science 02:47:02 Anesthesia & Cryonics? 03:00:03 Cosmic Solipsism? 03:02:10 POV self vs. the memory self? 03:09:04 The internal relatedness of all things 03:12:46 Analytic idealism and death 03:22:22 The psychological implications of believing idealism 03:24:53 Idealism and cosmopsychism 03:35:34 John Leslie, the multiverse, and idealism 03:44:00 Levels of dissociation? 03:48:00 Close #idealism #BernardoKastrup #interview "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."