У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Wagoner v. Lewis Gale Medical Center, LLC Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, которое было загружено на ютуб. Для скачивания выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o... Wagoner v. Lewis Gale Medical Center, LLC | 2016 WL 3893135 (2016) Responding to discovery can sometimes take hundreds of hours and cost thousands of dollars. At what point do discovery requests become so burdensome that a party doesn’t have to respond? We explore that question in the Twenty Sixteen case Wagoner versus Lewis Gale Medical Center. Jim Wagoner worked as a security guard for Lewis Gale Medical Center from April through June of Twenty Fourteen. He was then terminated. Wagoner filed suit against Lewis Gale in federal district court and alleged that he was terminated in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Specifically, Wagoner alleged that Lewis Gale fired him because he had dyslexia. In discovery, Wagoner sought the production of electronically stored information, or E S I, from two of his supervisors. Wagoner limited his requests to a four-month period. He further limited his requests to E S I that contained certain search terms, such as Wagoner and dyslexia. Lewis Gale contended that it’d have to hire an outside company to run the searches. That company estimated that it would cost approximately forty-five thousand dollars to search and review the E S I. Accordingly, Lewis Gale objected to producing the information. Wagoner filed a motion to compel, which Lewis Gale opposed. Lewis Gale argued that Wagoner’s requests weren’t proportional to the needs of the case and that the E S I wasn’t reasonably accessible. Therefore, Lewis Gale contended it shouldn’t have to produce the E S I. Alternatively, Lewis Gale asked the court to shift the cost of production to Wagoner. Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/wagoner... The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o... Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/wagoner... Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_... Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-o... Facebook ► / quimbeedotcom Twitter ► / quimbeedotcom #casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries