Interviewing Randselva Team - A Drawingless Bridge Project - Part 2 скачать в хорошем качестве

Interviewing Randselva Team - A Drawingless Bridge Project - Part 2

MoB EP 15 - Ultimate Interview with Randselva Bridge Team - Part 2 of 2. This bridge has been designed, approved and being built without drawings. MoB interviewed some team members, I have felt very inspired, I hope you too will feel inspired with everything they are sharing on this interview. Oystein Ulvestad from SWECO, Specialist in model-based projecting, drawing-less design and parametric design of bridges. Rasmus Sainmaa from SWECO, Bridge BIM Specialist and Parametric Design Developer. Sigmund Log from Vegdirektoratet, head of the Verification and Approval of bridges and other load-bearing structures. Tiago Vieira from Armando Rito Engenharia, Design Teams Leader. Follow me:   / gabrielnevesmob     / gabriel-neves-90813626   This Episode (15) Part 6 - Construction Part 7 - Asset Management Part 8 - Final Thoughts Part 9 - Why This Part 10 - Thank You All Previous Episode (14) Part 1 - Introductions Part 2 - The Client Part 3 - Cultural Influence Part 4 - Approval & Inspections Part 5 - Design & Detailing _____________________________________________________________________________ This Episode (15) Part 6 - Construction 0:40 - This is the very first project without any drawings for PNC. What are you doing to help them? 1:35 - What are you doing to improve site working conditions? 2:45 - How are the Health and safety measures transmitted to the teams on site? 3:20 - How clash free objects are highlighted? Part 7 - Asset Management 4:55 - Is the client going to use the model for asset management? Is Statens Vegvesen going to use it in the future for anything else, or it is a closed page? 7:45 - Has monitoring systems been implemented in Randselva Bridge? 8:45 - Are the figures for the improvement in cost efficiency going to be shared? 10:05 - Is there any financial incentive if the extra cost is reduced? Part 8 - Final Thoughts 10:35 - For you all. The biggest challenge and the coolest episode. 16:15 - How to avoid silo culture? 18:30 - What is the advice you have to give to other clients, designers and contractors around the world that want to try this way of work? 20:10 - Is this influencing Armando Rito attitude towards BIM? 21:15 - Any messages for students? 27:20 - Is this the end? 28:20 - What’s next? Part 9 - Why This 30:50 - Why are you doing this? _____________________________________________________________________________________ Previous Episode (14) Part 2 - The Client 1:20 - Who is the owner of this project? 1:40 - Who had the original idea? 3:00 - Then we have PNC and Isachen as contractor, Armando Rito as designers, Sweco as detailers and Statens Vegvesen as the client and what about the approvers? 3:40 - Is this an alliance or are you all tied directly to the client? Part 3 - Cultural Influence 4:45 - Is there anything special about Nordic culture which influenced this project? 5:55 - How did Portuguese culture adapt to this way of work? Were there many pessimists? 6:50 - Any good or bad episodes regarding reactions of construction workers? Part 4 - Approval & Inspections 8:55 - Why did you guys start developing a 3D model based approval process? How many models have Statens Vegvesen already approved with this method? 11:00 - Was the “law” changed to accommodate this? 12:55 - Is the information you need to approve the bridge all contained in the model? How do you make remarks? 14:40 - Are you open to share that process with your colleagues from other DoTs around the globe? 16:30 - Inspections and approval in Finland Part 5 - Design & Detailing 17:00 - How did the Armando Rito team react when found out this was going to be a drawingless project? 18:40 - What were the main constraints and what led to the final bridge solution on the Randselva project? 20:00 - What can you say about the complexity of the bridge solution and the way it has influenced this model based project? 21:15 - We know that a pan European team worked on those models, and we all know that Tekla Model Sharing is a very reliable tool to have more than one person working on the same model. The question is, how did you deal with the Grasshopper scripts? Were those scripts controlled by just a few to avoid problems? 23:00 - Grasshopper / Tekla workflow explained 24:00 - Can a 3D BIM model beat a 2D drawing in quantity and quality of information? 25:00 - Is anyone there breaking the rule and drafting some 2D drawings to help the site workers? 29:00 - What was the biggest challenge regarding software limitations? __________________________________________________________________________________ Credits: Photographs and videos kindly provided by SWECO, PNC, Armando Rito Engenharia, Isachsen & Trimble. Music from https://www.epidemicsound.com: Fight for glory by FormantX Honey take my hand by Cody Francis Western call by Cody Francis Thumbnail https://www.canva.com/