Dad Said Sister's MBA Had "Better ROI" Than My Stanford Degree — I Proved Him Wrong With Math скачать в хорошем качестве

Dad Said Sister's MBA Had "Better ROI" Than My Stanford Degree — I Proved Him Wrong With Math

"Emma's MBA has a clearer return on investment. You're already good at programming—you don't need Stanford's name. Do the online UT Austin program for $30,000 instead." My father said this in summer 2016, sitting across from me at our kitchen table, explaining why he was giving my sister $80,000 from our education fund for her MBA while giving me only $30,000 for an online master's degree—instead of the $120,000 I needed for Stanford's Computer Science program where I'd already been accepted. He had spreadsheets. Projections. "ROI analysis" showing Emma's marketing MBA would generate better returns than my Stanford CS degree. I was 22. Holding my Stanford acceptance letter. Watching my father choose my sister's "clearer" path over my potential. I said "okay." Enrolled in UT Austin's online program. Got a job at IBM. Worked 60-70 hour weeks—engineer by day, grad student by night—for 2.5 years. Meanwhile, Emma got her MBA, worked in marketing for 2.5 years, then quit to start a consulting business. Dad gave her the remaining $30,000 from the education fund to "sustain her business." The business failed in 11 months. Three clients total. $8,000 revenue. I went from IBM ($78K) to Facebook ($205K) to Stripe ($235K). Built $850K net worth by age 26. October 2024: Dad called. "I'm retiring. Pension got cut 40%. Can't afford the mortgage. Need $3,000/month. You're doing well in tech. This would be easy for you." I said: "Let me run the numbers." I spent a week building the most detailed spreadsheet of my life. Three tabs: TAB 1: Education Fund Opportunity Cost Dad gave Emma $110K ($80K MBA + $30K failed business) Gave me $30K That $80K difference invested in S&P 500 (2016-2024): $209,400 TAB 2: Stanford Salary Premium Conservative estimate of lost earnings (Stanford path vs my actual path): $230,000 over 8 years TAB 3: Total Cost of Dad's 2016 Decision $209K + $230K = $439,400 opportunity cost TAB 4: Mortgage Support Break-Even Dad requesting $36K/year Years to break even: $439K ÷ $36K = 12.2 years He'd need support until age 69 just to cover what he cost me I emailed him the spreadsheet with this message: "Dad, you made a financial decision in 2016 based on ROI analysis. I'm making a financial decision in 2024 based on demonstrated ROI. You chose to optimize for Emma's projected returns. I'm choosing to optimize for my actual returns. You taught me to think like an investor. Helping you has a 12.2-year payback period with high risk of additional requests. My answer is no." He called 23 times that week. I didn't answer. Emma called me "heartless." Dad lost the house to foreclosure three months later. I invested that $3,000/month he wanted into my own portfolio instead. Eight years ago, he did the math and decided I wasn't worth investing in. This year, I did the math and decided he wasn't worth investing in. He taught me that everything is a transaction. I just applied the lesson better than he expected. 💬 THE QUESTION: If your parent gave your sibling $110K because they had "better ROI" and gave you $30K, then showed up 8 years later asking you to pay their mortgage after your sibling's investment failed—would you help them? Or would you send them a spreadsheet showing exactly what their choice cost you? Comment below. Show your work. 🔗 CONNECT: Subscribe for more stories:    / @silentsonsvengeance   ⚠️ DISCLAIMER: This story is told from one perspective for educational purposes. Family financial decisions, education funding, and sibling dynamics are complex. This channel explores real scenarios where people chose financial independence over rescuing family members who didn't invest in them. Not financial advice. --- © Silent Son's Vengeance 2025