У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Why This Canadian Jet Debate Has Washington on Edge или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Why This Canadian Jet Debate Has Washington on Edge Why did a routine fighter jet review trigger panic inside the Pentagon? For decades, Canada’s military aviation choices followed a predictable path: American aircraft, American systems, and seamless alignment with Washington. That’s why Canada’s decision to re-examine its fighter jet strategy sent shockwaves through U.S. defense circles. This video breaks down why Canada’s fighter jet debate is about far more than aircraft. As costs tied to the Lockheed Martin F-35 surged and timelines slipped, Canadian lawmakers began asking uncomfortable questions about long-term dependency, sovereignty, and control. What followed was not just a procurement review—but a geopolitical stress test. We explore: Why the F-35 is more than a jet—it’s a closed defense ecosystem How Canada’s review threatens long-standing assumptions inside NORAD The Arctic’s growing role in North American defense strategy Why alternatives like the Saab Gripen worry Washington far more than expected How this decision could trigger a global domino effect among U.S. allies This isn’t a story about stealth versus speed. It’s about control versus sovereignty, and why even a quiet pause from Canada has unsettled Washington. Whether Canada stays the course or charts a more independent path, one thing is clear: the era of unquestioned defense alignment is being challenged. Watch to the end to understand what the Pentagon is really afraid of—and why this moment could reshape future military alliances. FAIR USE DISCLAIMER This video may contain copyrighted material that has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We believe this constitutes a “fair use” of any such material as provided for in Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act. The material is used for educational, commentary, analysis, and research purposes, and to promote discussion on matters of public interest such as geopolitics, economics, trade policy, and international relations. All video clips, images, and audio excerpts are used transformatively — meaning they are re-edited, narrated over, and repurposed to create new meaning and context. No copyright infringement is intended. All rights belong to their respective owners. If you are a copyright holder and believe your material has been used improperly, please contact us at: 📧 contact: usaeconomy356@gmail.com and we will review and resolve the matter promptly.