COMPREHENSIVE TEST: Redflex vs Radar Detectors Test, Part I скачать в хорошем качестве

COMPREHENSIVE TEST: Redflex vs Radar Detectors Test, Part I

File under: #RadarDetectors #RadarDetectorReviews #RadarDetectorTests #RedFlex #AGD340 #AGD342 #PolarizedRadar The Redflex radar speed camera photo enforcement system is what I believe to be the most lethal and hard to detect form of traffic radar employed currently in the U.S. even harder to detect than MultaRadar C, MultaRadar CD (MRCD), MultaRadar CT (MRCT)--which are vertically polarized. These RedFlex systems employ a very low powered K-band patch antenna radar that is horizontally polarized making is extremely difficult on vertically polarized radar detectors. Depending on certain factors including a detector's horn design and geometry, drops in sensitivity can by as much as 15dB or more than 40dB. These systems are designed to performance very close range speed measurement with distances ranging from about 70 feet to about 231 feet maximum. The antenna is angled at 22 degrees off-axis to allow it to read multiple lanes and even further reduce detection ranges. Even the very best radar detectors struggle with detecting these systems and drivers have precious little time to react to their alerts. This is the first of two tests of its kind which includes all leading and top performance radar detectors currently available. Detectors tested are: Uniden R7, Uniden R3, Escort Max 360c, Escort iXc, Escort Redline EX, Radenso XP, Radenso Pro M, Valentine One, Whistler CR97, and the Cobra RAD 450. We've also included another yet to be announced radar detector, which will remain unnamed, but will be identified by name here once the product is officially announced. Test results and analysis can be found at the following: [Hyperlink of article to be placed here] For more information about these radar detectors or to make a purchase be sure to visit: http://www.radarbusters.com This test took four days to produce so your support will help ensure that we will be able to continue to conduct informative real-world tests to help you make the right choices when it comes to your preferred countermeasure arsenal. An even more difficult to detect Redflex system was test in part 2 of this test which can be found at the following:    • COMPREHENSIVE TEST: Redflex vs Radar Detec...   CORRECTION: Thanks to an astute watcher (RedRocket) who pointed out an error in my description of the radar beam. I stated it was narrow like a ruler but the beam pattern is actually 90 degrees (vertical) to what I had indicated. The beam pattern with this system is 15 degrees vertically (to a 3dB loss) by 4.5 degrees horizontally (to a 3db loss). Thank you for pointing my error. The important take away here is the best detection performance is seen when the transmitter and receiver are of the same polarization plane, be it horizontally or vertically and at its worst when they are 90 degrees out of phase as is the case here. For those wishing a deep dive into the subject of polarization, the following article is a must read! http://www.escortradarforum.com/forum...