Criminal Law - criminal damages act 1971, theft act 1968 and fraud act 2006 скачать в хорошем качестве

Criminal Law - criminal damages act 1971, theft act 1968 and fraud act 2006

Disclaimer The Video Content has been made available for informational and educational purposes only. Law Darling and Rajeshkumar does not make any representation or warranties with respect to the accuracy, applicability, fitness, or completeness of the Video Content. Law Darling and Rajeshkumar does not warrant the performance, effectiveness or applicability of any sites listed or linked to in any Video Content. The Video Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice. Always seek the advice of lawyer with any questions you may have regarding any legal issues or legal problems. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read or seen on the Site. Law Darling and Rajeshkumar hereby disclaims any and all liability to any party for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental or other consequential damages arising directly or indirectly from any use of the Video Content, which is provided as is, and without warranties. Problem Question: Anne has hired Zoltan, a local plumber, to renovate her bathroom. As Zoltan is installing the basin, he gets a phone call. Zoltan uses one hand to answer the phone call and drops the basin, causing serious cracks. He decides not to tell Anne as he is worried about bad online reviews. Zoltan installs the basin, hoping that Anne would not realise it was damaged. In fact, the basin soon starts leaking. When Anne left for work that morning she told Zoltan to help himself to tea. As lunchtime approached, Zoltan was hungry. He searched Anne’s kitchen cupboards and made himself a sandwich. He then wandered upstairs and in the bedroom he found an envelope filled with £20 notes. Zoltan took £40 thinking Anne would not notice that the money was missing. Later that day, Zoltan goes to a laundromat to wash his work clothes. He has only one coin in his pocket and when he tries to put the coin in the machine slot he finds it does not fit. Zoltan then realises it is foreign currency. Undeterred, he goes to the laundromat next door. This time, Zoltan is successful in using the foreign coin and his laundry is washed. (a) If you were the prosecutor, what offence(s), if any, would you charge in relation to Zoltan and the basin? (b) Explain your reasoning in relation to (a) above. (c) If you were the prosecutor, what offence(s), if any, would you charge in relation to the Zoltan and the sandwich? (d) Explain your reasoning in relation to (c) above. (e) What arguments could be raised by the defence in relation to the charge in (c) above? (f) How would you respond to the arguments raised by defence in (e)? (g) If you were the prosecutor, what offence(s), if any, would you charge in the matter of taking the £40? (h) Explain your reasoning in relation to (g) above. (i) What arguments could be raised by the defence in relation to the charge in (g) above? (j) If you were the prosecutor, what offence(s), if any, would you charge in matter of laundromat? (k) Give reasons for your answer in (j). #criminallaw #criminaldamagesact1971 #theftact1968 #fraudact2006 #criminaldamagesact #theftact #fraudact