Chess Challenge Win vs. Bot/Engine 15 - Advanced (1900) - chess.com - [2nd Win] скачать в хорошем качестве

Chess Challenge Win vs. Bot/Engine 15 - Advanced (1900) - chess.com - [2nd Win]

My 2nd Win vs. Bot/Engine Komodo15 (1900) achieved on March 12th 2026. Also among my best chess games so far. This was probably the last and final time i played this opponent. Actually it's an Endgame Win (Checkmate) because there was only the King left for the opponent and i checkmated the opponent in 53 moves! However chess.com's Game Review evaluated this as a Middlegame Win (the same that happened in my Game/1st win vs. Bot/Engine 18 - Expert (2200) ) for the same reasons as it happened there like i explained it in the comments of that video. According to chess.com's Game Review there are 3 "Misses" and 1 "Blunder" in this game. However all 3 "Misses" were intended by me (just like in my Game/first win vs. Bot/Engine 18 - Expert (2200) ) and even that "Blunder" was also intended by me: I knew that i had some earlier chances to checkmate the opponent even quicker and i had noticed that! However (just like in that game vs. Bot/Engine 18 - Expert (2200) ) i wanted to completely destroy the opponent and take all his pieces before checkmating him! That's why i hesitated, i knew i could checkmate it then and end the game but i had to choose. I knew if i didn't take the opportunity and kept going to annihilate him completely, the Game Review would probably be worse because those opportunities that i intentionally didn't take would be evaluated by the Game Review as "Misses" but i didn't care. As for that "Blunder": again i knew my Knight was threatened but i chose to sacrifice my knight in order to take the opponent's bishop! That was evaluated as "Blunder" by the Game Review (again i don't care)... the Game Review Analysis evaluates things only mathematically/numerically in numbers and doesn't know/understand the real intentions/ideas/strategies/creativity of a human player!!... For the Game Review Analysis it is simple: the quicker the checkmate the better!... Chess.com's old Game Review Analysis back in 2023 was much better and more realistic! Chess.com's current Game Review Analysis is too strict and too mathematical/numerical (and thus less realistic), always disappoints, frustrates and angers me! I asked myself "For what did i do all this and put all the effort? For this? Was it a waste of time?". That's why in certain games where i had 3 Brilliant moves the Game Review Analysis gave a low elo and low accuracy for the game! Why? Because some planned steps that led to those brilliant moves were mathematically/numerically evaluated as Blunder, Mistake, Inaccuracy or Miss. That's a paradox and a contradiction in itself!!... There are even many Grandmasters who've complained about chess.com's current Game Review Analysis! I've come to realize that chess.com's Game Review Analysis is NOT an "infallible perfect oracle which is always right and never wrong"! It is NOT "the be-all and the end-all"! 1 example: Back when i was practising/training with the Analysis vs. engine 20, there were a few moments in the Endgame where had i kept listening to the Analysis the game would have been a never ending Draw of endless repetitions. But because i finally had an idea/plan/strategy of my own and stopped listening to the analysis recommendations but went on with my own decision, i found a way to break the cycle of endless repetitions and turned a Draw into a Win!!...