У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Counting Irreducible Polynomials of Given Degree (Algebra 3: Lecture 22 Video 3) или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Lecture 22: We started this lecture by reviewing some things that we know about extensions of finite fields. We have seen that subfields of F_{p^n} are in bijection with divisors d of n. We saw that each of these subfields gives a Galois extension of Fp that is cyclic and we described a generator for it. After talking about finite extensions of Fp we mentioned that there is an analogous set of results for finite extensions of any finite field (not necessarily of prime order). We discussed a neat application-- x^4+1 is irreducible in Z[x], but is reducible modulo p for each prime p. We proved that F_{p^n} is a simple extension of Fp and gave the number of primitive elements for this extension. We proved that x^{p^n}-x is the product of all the distinct irreducible polynomials of degree d in Fp[x] where d runs through all divisors of n. We saw how this led to a formula for the number of irreducibles in Fp[x] of degree 1,2, and 4. We mentioned that using the Möbius Inversion Formula, one can prove a general formula for the number of irreducibles of degree n. At the end of the lecture we discussed isomorphisms between finite fields. Reading: In this lecture we followed Section 14.3 of Dummit and Foote pretty closely. We gave a slightly different explanation for the proof of Proposition 18. We mentioned Exercise 9 in Section 14.3-- I highly encourage you to do it. We also mentioned several Algebra Qualifying Exam problems: Spring 2019 #7, Spring 2006 #8, Fall 2004 #7, and Spring 2001 #5 (these last three are all pieces of Exercise 9). I also encourage you to take a look at Conrad's notes, 'Finite Fields’: https://kconrad.math.uconn.edu/blurbs... This document proves some of the same things we have seen here, but presents things differently.