Traore is safe as Trump’s Coup plans in the Sahel exposed by Russia. скачать в хорошем качестве

Traore is safe as Trump’s Coup plans in the Sahel exposed by Russia.

No cameras flashing. No dramatic speeches. Just two foreign ministers… and a quiet agreement signed under a name so technical it almost disappears on the page. But don’t let the silence fool you. This moment carries weight. Because when Burkina Faso moves closer to Russia right now, in this global climate, it’s not random — it’s strategic. So the real question isn’t just what was signed. It’s why now? Is this about security? About sanctions and shifting alliances? About gold, leverage, weapons, and military training? Is Ouagadougou expanding its options… or is Moscow expanding its influence? And perhaps even more interesting — why does the reaction from Western capitals sound cautious instead of outraged? In geopolitics, timing is never accidental. Nations don’t deepen strategic ties in the middle of uncertainty unless they see opportunity hidden inside that uncertainty. So maybe the bigger story isn’t Russia at all. Maybe it’s momentum. Why this month? Why this shift? And what has changed in Burkina Faso’s security and diplomatic landscape to make this the right moment to act? Let’s break it down. A lengthy period of Sahel security cooperation came to an end as French forces left the nation in recent years. More than only troops were withdrawn. For many years, external security assistance was defined by a psychological anchor that was withdrawn. A state must either drift or redesign when that anchor vanishes. At the same time, following Sahelian political changes, regional rivalries inside Icoas grew more intense. Along with Mali and Niger, Burkina Faso expressed discontent with the previous regional structures and started to reconsider its partnerships. That change was not sentimental. It was structural. The external alliances must adapt if the regional balance shifts. Expand the lens now. Because of the crisis in Ukraine, Russia is subject to numerous Western sanctions. Financial transfers, technological transfers, and diplomatic contacts with a large portion of Europe and North America are all restricted by sanctions. Moscow has responded by seeking closer ties with non-Western allies, especially in Africa. Ideological romance is not what this is. It's a calculated change. Thus, two movements are occurring at the same time. Following the failure of its prior security architecture, Burkina Faso is looking for diverse collaborations. In the face of global polarisation, Russia is looking for more diplomatic channels. Meetings occur when two strategic needs come together. Last year, we also gave humanitarian aid to Burkina Faso top priority. We provided 25,000 tonnes of wheat at no cost. Additionally, we plan to ship a sizable quantity of additional food items to Agudugub this month. We value Burkina Faso's assistance as well as that of numerous international forums, such as the UN and other multilateral forums. The consultations between Russia and the Sahel States Confederation are a beneficial type of collaboration. Such a meeting with foreign ministers took place in Moscow in April of this year. We will get the opportunity to talk about some of the promising topics today. I appreciate your time and attention. However, most discussion overlooks a deeper layer. The global system is disintegrating. One block-dominated decision-making is no longer stable in the post-Cold War order. China has become more powerful. Russia has adjusted its stance. Autonomy is asserted by middle powers. The markets for energy have changed. Reorganisations are being made to supply chains. Today, strategic minerals play a major role in global industrial policy. Smaller states have a decision to make in situations like this. Due to habit, stay in your old alignments. Or, while the structure is still flexible, relocate early. Repositioning was Burkina Faso's choice. Additionally, when the environment is distracted, repositioning is simpler. Changes in Africa are frequently underestimated by major nations engaged with Europe and Asia. That makes room. peaceful area. There should be room for agreements that appear administrative but have strategic significance. There was no need for the February meeting to be spectacular. It was intentional. It was a procedural matter. And it's powerful because of it. Temporary gestures are not foundational agreements. They create platforms for sustained collaboration in trade, education, security, and diplomacy. However, beneath the time is the true stress. Was this a defensive attempt to close a gap in French security? Or did it offend? increasing Burkina Faso's bargaining power in a world with multiple powers. Because whether this moment is transformative or reactive depends on the answer to that question. Whether you’re tracking global power competition or Africa’s rise, this video gives you the context, evidence, and key players driving the story. 👉 Like, comment, and subscribe for more deep analysis on geopolitics and African strategic partnerships.