USA, Imputato insulta il giudice in udienza: condanna durissima скачать в хорошем качестве

USA, Imputato insulta il giudice in udienza: condanna durissima

Brian Noval viene incriminato per oltraggio alla corte a 120 giorni di carcere, per aver usato parole poco carine nei confronti del giudice John Hurley, che ha modificato le accuse per cui l'uomo aveva già subìto un processo il giorno precedente. E' interessante leggere anche cosa il giudice Hurley scrive sulla sua pagina Facebook, in relazione a questo fatto: "A few years ago I handled a case in which a young man was held in contempt for his in court behavior. Unfortunately, everytime that the clip of that event is played on Tosh.O or some other internet site, I get the crazies messaging me about what large ego I have and that I infringed on the young man's Freedom of Speech right and that I should be removed as a judge because of my evil tendancies. First, there is a certain commonality about the people who message me with veiled threats, profanity and abusive comments regarding my holding the young man in contempt. They are most often white males in their 20s and 30s. Many appear to be uneducated (or low education) anti-goverment/establishment types who probably live alone. I suspect that they have been victims of some type of abuse at an early age and carry an enormous amount of emotional disdain for males in positions of authority (thanks Dr. Laura and Dr. Phil). Many of them state that they hope I would die or be the victim of a tragic event. Let me first correct their misunderstanding of the First Amendment and Contempt issues. People do not have an unlimited right to Freedom Of Speech in a courtroom (though they probably do on the sidewalk in front of the courthouse). Can one imagine someone entering a courtroom during a trial, standing on a desk and shouting about how they dislike the president? Could a defendant start screaming so loud when the victim of sexual abuse testifies that the jury cannot hear her testimony? According to the thought process of some of the messagers , a judge would be powerless to stop the court disrupters least he trample upon their "rights". Judges routinely tell attorneys what they can and cannot ask a witness and what they cannot say during closing statments. However, it appears that some of the people who message me with threats an profanity don't understand that in order for justice to prevail, a judge has to maintain court order. Furthermore, contempt is usually not for the content of said speech (e.g.,unless a judge prehaps orders and attorney not to inform the jury about the defendant's criminal history and he/she does it anyway), but rather for the DISRUPTION that an individual causes to court procedings. Therefore, the case which has caused so many to message me with threats and hateful comments was NOT about what the young man said, rather it was for the DISRUPTION that he caused and was about to cause. Here is what the messagers don't know. The young man had been arrested for attempting to harm a family member and had a history of drug abuse. I had already received a call from jail secuity that he was a behavior problem with potential to incite other inmates. He used vulgarities twice. The second time that he spoke, he turned to people/inmates off camera to make the statement. At that time, he was in the courtroom with other violent prisoners. I felt that his intention was to incite others. He was then held in contempt and sentenced to 120 days in jail. Then, after a week or so, I mitigated his sentence to time-served just days before Christmas. He got a clear message about his behavior and the other inmates were put on notice. And, the First Amendment is still intact." _______________________________________­________________ (Video posted strictly for educational and informational purposes)