Why Are Women So Dangerous in Psychology ? скачать в хорошем качестве

Why Are Women So Dangerous in Psychology ?

Philosophy didn’t misunderstand the feminine. It erased it—systematically, and often without apology. From Plato to Freud, from Schopenhauer to Nietzsche, the figure of the woman was not treated as a subject—but as symbol, metaphor, absence, or threat. This video explores how the feminine was excluded not by oversight, but by design. How systems of thought were built to resist vulnerability, complexity, and contradiction—qualities often projected onto women, then discarded. Freud labeled her a puzzle, Nietzsche a disruption, Schopenhauer a defect. Jung came closer, suggesting she existed within the psyche as the anima—buried, distorted, but never gone. We also reflect on the women who broke through the silence. Simone de Beauvoir, Luce Irigaray, and Julia Kristeva didn’t ask for inclusion—they exposed the rot. They didn’t reclaim the system—they revealed what it cost to build it. This isn’t a history lesson. It’s an invitation to notice what still echoes. In classrooms. In institutions. In tone. And in the quiet ways certain voices are still required to translate themselves just to be allowed in. Simone de Beauvoir – The Second Sex Luce Irigaray – Speculum of the Other Woman Julia Kristeva – Powers of Horror, The Kristeva Reader Sigmund Freud – Theories on hysteria, repression, and sexual development Friedrich Nietzsche – Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Beyond Good and Evil Arthur Schopenhauer – On Women (from Parerga and Paralipomena) Carl Jung – The concept of the anima in Psychological Types, The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious