独家：习近平严控公务员辞职｜贼窝难出｜千年未有之大倒退 скачать в хорошем качестве

独家：习近平严控公务员辞职｜贼窝难出｜千年未有之大倒退

成为此频道的会员即可获享以下福利：    / @duwen2024   独家：习近平严控公务员辞职｜贼窝难出｜千年未有之大倒退 Exclusive: Xi Jinping Strictly Controls Civil Servant Resignations | Hard to Escape the Den of Thieves | The Greatest Regression in a Thousand Years 朋友们，大家好。最近中共体制内出了一件大事。习近平为了应对越来越多的公务员辞职潮，居然颁布法令不允许公职人员辞职。这是焦虑的习近平对内控制的一次重大升级。我们今天来关注这个话题。 在古代帝王时期，书生学子寒窗苦读数十载，一朝卖于帝王家。但也有来去自由一说。古诗云，有人星夜赶科举，有人辞官回故里。说的就是这种自由。因此我们常常看到古人辞职回乡归隐田园的故事。如今这样的故事已经很难上演。看来这真是千年未有之大倒退呀。 而现在呢？人们从生娃“上岸”，到幼儿园上岸、小学上岸、初中上岸、高中上岸、大学上岸、考公务员上岸……一路卷到头。结果发现——哎呀，原来还有一个最新项目，叫“辞职上岸”。过去，公务员这碗饭讲究的是“难进易退”：想考进体制，得拼命，千军万马挤独木桥；但真要走，只要拍桌一辞，收拾包袱走人即可。可如今，形势反过来了——能进不一定能出，辞职成了高风险操作。 很多人这才恍然大悟：在体制内混，最怕的不是升不上去，而是退不下来。 上周，中纪委和国家监委联合发了一篇文章，标题听起来挺正经：《纪法百科·一图读懂应知应会党纪法规：公务员辞去公职规定》。结果一打开，满满的“组织温情”扑面而来—— 整篇文件的核心意思，就一句话：“想走？没那么容易。” 其中列出了几种不得批准辞职的情形，条条看着都像是写给想跑的人： 第一类，“未满国家规定的最低服务年限的，不准走”；这种情况主要是针对哪些老少边穷地区、艰苦岗位，降分录用的部分，影响不大。 第二类，“涉及国家秘密岗位的，不准走”；在中共体制内，基本上科级以上官员都会接触一些涉密文件，就这一条基本就框住了绝大多数，共产党官员。 第三类，“重要公务未办完的，不准走”；这句话更直白，不先让你走你就走不了，当初老杜想辞职，就是因为这一条，而走不了。 第四类，“正在接受审计、纪检监察调查的，更不能走”；对于这类人，想辞职脱身，门也没有。不要想了。 第五类，最后还补上一句最狠的：“法律、行政法规规定的其他情形”—— 这就等于说：凡我共产党不想让你走的情况，都叫‘其他情形’。这条简直是艺术级的兜底条款。法律讲究逻辑，中共讲究口袋。只要我想装你进袋子，永远有理由。所以现在的公务员们心里都明白：体制就像一艘船。上船那天，你以为是上了“铁饭碗号”，后来才发现，原来是“贼船号”。铁饭碗不再是保障，而是成了牢笼。 表面上，中国公务员法也好、相关规定也罢，都允准公务员可以提出辞职。但上述“五条一出，辞职之路基本被堵得死死的 。总结起来就是：要么你还没服满役，要么你知道的太多，要么你有事在身，要么你干系重大，要么就是我不想放你走。如此一来，所谓公务员“辞职自由”几乎变成纸上画饼——看起来有，真要用时没有。 更绝的是，这还不算完。假设你穷尽洪荒之力，终于满足条件把辞职批下来了，组织照样有后招：离职后几年内的种种从业限制。比如当过领导的公务员，离职后三年内不得在原管辖范围的企业任职，经商赚钱都不行；普通公务员也有两年的行业禁入期 。而且这几年里，你每年都得向原单位报告自己的职业动向，人家还要核实你有没有违规 。这感觉怎么样？就算你人走了，组织的长臂依旧紧紧箍着你。 最后，还有违约金这一出。要是你跟单位签过培训协议约定服务年限，没干满就想走，行，可以，但是请先把违约金交了 。金额呢，不会超过培训费总额，但也够你肉疼。这就像是在告诉你：“出来混，总是要还的”，想半路跳船，先把船票钱补上。 总而言之，官方的这套辞职规定就是给公务员套上了层层锁链。从法律逻辑上看，表面是维护组织利益、保守国家秘密，实际上更像是念了一道紧箍咒，誓把人牢牢困在体制笼子里。难怪网友调侃：“公务员辞职？呵，除非你是没脑子没背景的小喽啰，不然这辈子就死心塌地给体制当螺丝钉吧。” Exclusive: Xi Jinping Strictly Controls Civil Servant Resignations | Hard to Escape the Den of Thieves | The Greatest Regression in a Thousand Years Friends, greetings to you all. Recently, a major event has occurred within the Chinese Communist Party system. In response to a growing wave of civil servant resignations, Xi Jinping has gone so far as to issue a decree forbidding public officials from resigning. This marks a significant escalation in Xi’s internal control efforts. Today, let’s take a closer look at this topic. In ancient times, during the reigns of emperors, scholars studied diligently for decades, ultimately selling their talents to the imperial court. But even then, there was a notion of freedom to come and go. As the ancient poem says: “Some race through the night to take the imperial exam, while others resign and return to their hometowns.” It reflects a kind of liberty. Thus, we often see tales of ancient officials resigning and retreating to the countryside. But today, such stories have become nearly impossible to play out. It truly seems to be the greatest regression in a thousand years. And now? From giving birth and “coming ashore,” to preschool, elementary, middle, and high school “coming ashore,” to university and then landing a civil servant job—people toil through every stage. Only to find—ah, there’s a new trend now: “coming ashore by resigning.” In the past, civil service was known for being “hard to get into, easy to leave”: entering the system required fierce competition, with thousands charging across a narrow bridge; but leaving—just slam the table, resign, pack up, and walk away. Now, the situation has flipped—getting in doesn’t mean you can get out. Resigning has become a high-risk move. Only now do many people realize: what’s most frightening in the system isn’t failing to climb up—it’s being unable to step down. Last week, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the National Supervisory Commission jointly published an article, with a seemingly proper title: Disciplinary and Legal Encyclopedia·Infographic Guide to Must-Know Party Regulations: Regulations on Civil Servant Resignation. But upon opening it, what pours out is the full force of “organizational warmth.” The essence of the whole document can be summed up in one sentence: “Want to leave? Not so easy.” It lists several situations in which resignation is not permitted—each one reads like it was written specifically for those trying to flee: First category: “Those who have not completed the minimum required service period are not allowed to resign.” This mainly targets people in underdeveloped or remote areas placed through lowered entry standards—not a major issue for most.