Saudi Arabia & UAE Refused US Their Airspace — How Does America Strike Iran Without It? скачать в хорошем качестве

Saudi Arabia & UAE Refused US Their Airspace — How Does America Strike Iran Without It?

Saudi Arabia & UAE Refused US Their Airspace — How Does America Strike Iran Without It? Saudi Arabia and the UAE publicly refused to allow the United States to use their airspace for military action against Iran. Within 72 hours, Kuwait, Qatar and Oman followed with similar statements. Headlines framed it as a fracture in America’s Middle East coalition. This investigation examines what happened next. As Gulf states announced neutrality, the Pentagon accelerated a visible military repositioning: large-scale F-35 deployments to Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, expanded tanker traffic through the Atlantic and UK bases, increased carrier strike group presence, and renewed attention on long-range strike platforms capable of operating without Gulf airspace. We analyze how Washington could conduct operations against Iran without Saudi or Emirati air corridors. That includes forward basing in Jordan, long-range B-2 sorties from the continental United States, the strategic importance of Diego Garcia, and the role of submarine-launched Tomahawk cruise missiles operating from international waters. The stakes extend far beyond flight paths. Iran has warned that any country facilitating an attack would be treated as hostile. Gulf leaders, still mindful of the 2019 strikes on Saudi oil infrastructure, are signaling distance to reduce retaliation risk. At the same time, questions remain over Iraqi airspace, IRGC retaliation doctrine, missile escalation scenarios, and the long-term impact on oil markets and regional nuclear calculations. We break down: – Why Gulf refusals increase operational complexity but do not eliminate US options – The strategic value of Diego Garcia and UK-US tensions over basing rights – The military role of F-35 suppression missions and B-2 bunker-penetrating capabilities – Submarine strike capacity in the Arabian Sea and Gulf of Oman – The wider geopolitical implications for Iran negotiations, Hormuz security, and global energy stability This is not about rhetoric. It is about logistics, basing geometry, escalation management, and the difference between a one-night strike and a sustained campaign. Sources The New York Times – US military deployments and regional buildup coverage https://www.nytimes.com/ The War Zone (The Drive) – Analysis of F-35 movements, B-2 operations and strike capabilities https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone BBC News – UK government position on Diego Garcia and international law concerns https://www.bbc.com/news Fars News Agency (Iranian state media) – Iranian reactions and statements regarding regional bases https://www.farsnews.ir/ Chapters 00:00 Gulf Refusals 03:20 Jordan Pivot 06:40 Iraq Corridor 09:30 UK Rift 12:30 Diego Garcia 15:30 Submarine Option 18:00 Retaliation Risk 20:00 Strategic Endgame #Iran #MiddleEast #Hormuz #IRGC #USMilitary #DiegoGarcia #OilMarkets #Geopolitics #GlobalSecurity #Pentagon #NuclearProgram #GulfStates #MilitaryStrategy #CarrierStrikeGroup