Dr. Kaladaka Prabhakar Bhat Case Rocks Court ⚖️ | “Who Is the Aggrieved Person?” Judge Asks скачать в хорошем качестве

Dr. Kaladaka Prabhakar Bhat Case Rocks Court ⚖️ | “Who Is the Aggrieved Person?” Judge Asks

Is every controversial speech a crime, or must the law prove real harm first? In this video, we break down the Feb 11, 2026 court hearing involving alleged hate speech on the Vikasana TV YouTube channel featuring Dr. Prabhakar. The State argued the broadcast could instigate youngsters against communities, pushing for criminal action. But the Court zeroed in on a crucial legal question: 👉 Can a social worker file such a complaint as an “aggrieved person”? Justice scrutiny didn’t stop there. The hearing reflects a larger judicial trend seen across recent cases: ⚖️ Courts demanding proper legal standing ⚖️ Strong push against selective prosecution ⚖️ Warning that civil disputes cannot be painted as criminal offences From locus standi to procedural fairness, this case shows how courts are testing whether the ingredients of a crime truly exist before allowing prosecution. Watch till the end for a clear breakdown of: ✔ What the State argued ✔ What the Court questioned ✔ Why this ruling could shape future speech cases 👇 Comment your view: Should controversial speech automatically lead to criminal cases? #CourtroomDrama #FreeSpeech #HateSpeechLaw #IndianCourts #LegalExplainer #YouTubeCase