У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Vande Matram मुस्लिम विरोधी गीत है? | Third Eye | Dr. Pankaj Shrivastava| Neeraj Jha или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
In this new episode of Third Eye, Neeraj Jha and senior journalist Pankaj Shrivastava dive deep into a debate that has been reignited by Prime Minister Narendra Modi — the claim that Jawaharlal Nehru “cut” the national song Vande Mataram before adopting it. The discussion goes beyond political soundbites and examines the historical, cultural, and constitutional layers that shaped India’s decision regarding the national song. The episode starts by breaking down Modi’s allegation: Did Nehru really remove portions of Vande Mataram, and if so, why? Neeraj and Pankaj trace the origins of the song, exploring Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay’s original composition and its deep emotional significance during the freedom struggle. But they also highlight a crucial, often-ignored reality — the latter stanzas of Vande Mataram are a hymn to Goddess Kali. Through a rational and historical lens, the episode explains why this posed a challenge for a newly independent nation committed to secularism. The hosts point out that adopting a devotional hymn as a national symbol in a diverse country with multiple faiths would have contradicted the inclusive character of the Indian state. The decision to adopt only the first two stanzas, which celebrate the motherland without invoking any specific deity, was therefore not an act of disrespect but a thoughtful, logical step toward creating a secular national identity. Neeraj and Pankaj further discuss how this old debate is resurfacing today and why political narratives selectively twist historical events for present-day optics. They underline the importance of revisiting history with honesty and nuance rather than with ideological convenience. This episode of Third Eye offers clarity, context, and a much-needed grounded perspective on a controversy often used to provoke emotions rather than encourage understanding. Through meticulous reasoning and factual depth, it reminds viewers why history must be read as it happened — not as it is politically required today. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 📲 Available on: • Molitics App (iOS) – Molitics App IOS • Molitics App (Android) – Molitics App Android • Website – www.molitics.in 📢 Follow us on: • Facebook – Molitics • Twitter – @moliticsindia • Telegram – Moliticss • Instagram – @moliticsindia • WhatsApp Channel – Molitics Official 📩 Contact us at: [email protected]