The Shortcomings of CRI's "We Were Wrong" | Part 2: Even if CRI was wrong, LSM still is not right скачать в хорошем качестве

The Shortcomings of CRI's "We Were Wrong" | Part 2: Even if CRI was wrong, LSM still is not right

One final background video before getting into the meat of the discussion on local church theology that was ignored by CRI. To avoid diving into arguments that have been hashed out by the writers of the "Open Letter", LSM's "Open Letter" Response, CRI's "We Were Wrong", and Norm Geisler's "We Were Wrong" response, I am mostly conceding/bypassing the arguments made relating to Trinitarian Theology and Anthropology. However, this doesn't mean that LSM/Lee are off the hook as we will be going through other troubling teachings like the ground of the church, the overcomers, and the ministry of the age. All of which are things that CRI bypassed by saying they are "secondary" doctrines. If you are familiar with the recovery, you know that teachings like these are not pushed to the side as secondary, but absolutely necessary to Lee's theology. Links: Christian Research Journal: "We Were Wrong" - https://www.equip.org/christian-resea... Open-Letter (From Christian Leader to the Lord's recovery) - http://www.open-letter.org/ An-Open-Letter (From the Lord's recovery to Christian Leaders) - https://an-open-letter.org/en/ Norman Geisler's response to "We Were Wrong" - http://www.open-letter.org/pdf/Geisle... Ministry excerpts pulled from - https://www.ministrybooks.org/search/ The Lord's Recovery Unchained video on the "Local Ground" -    • Is the Lord's Recovery right about the gro...