У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Should You Try OpenClaw in Podcasting? или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
OpenClaw (originally called “ClawdBot”) is the latest craze in AI tools. It allows you to use large language models (LLMs) like GPT, Claude, Gemini, and more to dothings for you—not just writethings for you or make images or videos. It works by running on a computer, accessing programs, websites, and other tools, and running those things through the LLMs to accomplish tasks and work toward goals. I've only just started using OpenClaw, and I'm enjoying it. But I'm far from joining the cult of “steal my illegal secrets to run your business autonomously, make tons of profit online, and with no money down”! Here are some thoughts before you consider trying OpenClaw in yourpodcasting workflow. 1. OpenClaw has massive security risks Let me be careful with the wording here. I did not say OpenClaw is a security threat. I said it has massive security risks. That distinction matters. If you run OpenClaw on your own computer, you are potentially giving it access to a lot: your files, browser sessions, logins, private data, email, and more. That does not mean it will automatically misuse any of that. But it does mean you should think seriously about what it can access. Some people recommend running OpenClaw on a VPS instead of your main computer. That can reduce some risks by separating it from your local files and personal environment. But that setup has its own dangers, too. OpenClaw installations on internet-accessible servers are being actively scanned and exploited. If you can access it online, someone else may try to as well. Even something as simple as giving OpenClaw access to an email inbox could create problems if malicious instructions come in through email and the system is allowed to act on them. The good news is that OpenClaw’s developers seem to be improving security quickly. Vulnerabilities have been reported and patched fast. That is encouraging. But fast patches do not eliminate the need for caution. So here is the practical takeaway: think carefully about what you give OpenClaw access to. If you do not give it access to your browser, it cannot use your browser. If you do not connect sensitive tools, it cannot act through those tools. The more permissions you grant, the more risk you accept. These are risks, not necessarily active threats. But they are still real. Please take them seriously. 2. Using OpenClaw can be expensive OpenClaw itself is free and open-source software. That part is great. But the software is only part of the cost. If you connect OpenClaw to paid large language models like Claude Opus, Claude Sonnet, GPT, or models through a provider like OpenRouter, your usage costs can climb quickly. And I do mean quickly. When I first started experimenting with OpenClaw, I was mostly testing small tasks and trying different models. I was not even running large automations. But I still watched my costs rise fast. My OpenRouter credits kept auto-refilling, and before long I had spent around $100 simply exploring what was possible. That was enough to make me rethink my setup. Some people reduce costs by using subscriptions such as ChatGPT , where the monthly fee can make usage more predictable than paying token-by-token through an API provider. Others try running local models instead. Running locally can help in some cases, but that comes with tradeoffs too. First, local AI models require system resources. A lot of them require serious system resources. If you want strong performance, the hardware can get expensive fast. Yes, smaller local models exist, but they are often slower and less capable. Second, if you run OpenClaw locally on your main computer, you are back to the security concerns I mentioned earlier. A more isolated setup, such as a separate computer dedicated to OpenClaw, can be a smarter option. Some people use a Mac mini, an old laptop, or another separate machine. That can help contain the risk. But it is still additional hardware, which means additional cost. And then there is the biggest cost of all: a security mistake. If OpenClaw is connected to the wrong tools, or given the wrong permissions, or instructed carelessly, the damage could cost far more than any subscription, server, or device. So yes, OpenClaw can be expensive. Sometimes in obvious ways, and sometimes in much more serious ones. 3. OpenClaw is not SkyNet There is a lot of dramatic AI coverage right now, and some of it makes for great headlines. Stories about AI threatening users, exposing secrets, contacting authorities, or behaving in disturbing ways spread very quickly. But if you read past the headline and examine the details, you will usually find an important missing piece: the prompts, permissions, or tools the user gave it. That part matters a lot. In most cases, these systems are not spontaneously becoming evil masterminds. They are responding to instructions, permissions, and context. For example, if someone