Court denies motion to remove bodycam video | ID Refusal скачать в хорошем качестве

Court denies motion to remove bodycam video | ID Refusal

We appreciate your support for this video, sending you all our best wishes. You can visit and support the original creator here:    • PROSECUTOR *GETS OWNED*  HILLSBORO, NH POL...   ~~~~~~ ID Refusal scored a massive legal victory when the Hillsboro Court denied the Prosecutor's motion to remove the published bodycam video. This is a high-stakes First Amendment Audit where filming rights and public records directly confronted police overreach. This video dissects the police department's failed strategy to silence a citizen. The prosecution attempted to weaponize the New Hampshire bodycam statute (RSA 105-D:2) to impose a publication ban that the law did not allow. The citizen exposed this fatal loophole, proving that the statute's clause only applies to law enforcement agencies, not the general public or freedom of the press. Watch how this citizen beats the illegal ban and faces down fabricated charges like Breach of Bail and Disorderly Conduct just for filming. This is a crucial lesson in Police Accountability and your Constitutional Rights. The prosecutor's attempt to define public records as police property utterly collapsed under the weight of the First Amendment. This ruling confirms that once evidence is disclosed in discovery, it becomes public record, and citizens have the right to publish. TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 – 0:43: HOOK/CONFLICT: Officer orders camera off and threatens. Citizen stands firm. 0:43 – 1:50: ANALYSIS/STORY: Analysis of filming rights (First Amendment) in a public courthouse. 1:50 – 2:03: HIGH TENSION: Citizen defies courtroom protocol ("Only the dead rise"). 7:48 – 8:22: CORE CONFLICT: Officer threatens arrest for Bail Breach and shuts off the camera (Fourth Amendment Violation). 12:30 – 17:53: LEGAL BREAKDOWN: Prosecutor’s faulty argument using the bodycam statute (RSA 105-D:2). Citizen counters with Freedom of the Press. 26:05 – 28:07: SOLUTION/WIN: Reading the Ruling: Court denies motion to remove the video (Legal Victory). Comment below if you've been threatened with fake charges by the police while exercising your rights! #IDRefusal #FirstAmendmentAudit #PoliceAccountability #KnowYourRights #BodycamVideo #FourthAmendment #CourtVictory #PoliceOverreach #FreedomOfThePress #CopwatchMoments FAIR USE DISCLAIMER Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Fair use is a doctrine in the United States copyright law that allows limited, non-licensed use of copyrighted material without requiring permission, as codified in Section 107.