У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно APFSDS-T VS Various Armor (AL Alloy, RHA, Tungsten Alloy, Depleted Uranium, Titanium, Plastic, Iron) или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
This Video Present the APFSDS-T penetration against the various armor materials. The APFSDS-T dimensions and materials are equivalent to 120mm L23A1 APFSDS-T, while 700 mm thick armor with different materials (Aluminum alloy, steel, RHA, Tungsten Alloy, Depleted Uranium, Titanium, Plastic, Maraging Steel,Plastic, etc) are considered. Note: Plastic does not used as vehicle armor as single material, but it can be used in composite armor with combination of others armor materials. Please subscribe to our channel: / @extremeengineeringsimulati5627 Other Similar Videos: APFSDS-T VS Armor (AL Alloy, RHA, Tungsten Alloy, Depleted Uranium)# Armor Piercing Simulation • APFSDS-T VS Armor (AL Alloy, RHA, Tun... 1. 125mm BM15 APFSDS Projectile Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation • 125mm BM15 APFSDS Projectile Vs 250 B... 2. Bullet Penetration Vs Aluminum Plate #Failed Armor Penetration • Bullet Penetration Vs Aluminum Plate ... 3.120 mm KE M829A2 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Armor Inclined Plate • 120 mm KE M829 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Arm... 4. 7.62 NATO x 51mm Bullet Penetration on Aluminum Plate # Finite Element Analysis , Failed Penetration2 • 7.62 NATO x 51mm Bullet Penetration o... 5.7.62 NATO X 50 mm Bullet Vs Armor Steel Plate # Armor Penetration Simulation • 7.62 X 51mm NATO Bullet Vs Armor Stee... 6. BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation • BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Pie... 7.Shot, fixed A.P.T 90 mm T33 Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing Ammunition • Shot, fixed A.P.T 90 mm T33 Vs Reinfo... 8.7_62X51 mm NATO Vs Bulletproof Steel Vest #Armor Piercing Simulation • 7.62X51 mm NATO Vs Bulletproof Steel ... 9.120 mm M829 APFSDS Vs 125 mm BM 15 APFSDS # APFSDS Collision # Armor Piercing Simulation. • 120 mm M829 APFSDS Vs 125 mm BM 15 AP... 10.Low Quality Armor Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing simulation • Bomb (Kinetic Energy Penetrator) Vs R... 11. Pz Kpfw V (Panther) Tank Vs Shot, A.P., 90mm, T33 # Armor Penetration simulation • 90 mm t33 Vs German Pz Kpfw V (Panthe... 12.125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation • 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # A... 13. 3VBM3/3BM9 APFSDS Vs M829 APFSDS #APFSDS Collision • 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS Vs 120 mm M829 APF... 14. APFSDS Vs NERA #Non Explosive Reactive Armor • APFSDS Vs NERA #Non Energetic Reactiv... 15. 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation • 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # A... 16. 105 mm APFSDS-T M900 Vs Leopard 2 # Ballistic Simulation • 105 mm APFSDS-T M900 Vs Leopard 2 # ... 17. 120 mm K276 APFSDS-T Vs Armour Plate #Ballistic Simulation • 120 mm K276 APFSDS-T Vs Armour Plate ... 18. 120 mm M829A2 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 Turret # Armor Piercing Simulation Part-1 • 120 mm M829A2 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 T...