У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Why Feeling Convicted Doesn't Mean You're Converted или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
Jonathan Edwards observed a pattern that most pastors wouldn't dare name: the majority of people sitting in church every Sunday—people who prayed, took communion, and affirmed orthodox doctrine—showed no evidence of actual conversion. Not backsliders. Not obvious hypocrites. Regular church members who believed they were saved. Edwards spent decades documenting what happened during and after the Great Awakening revivals, and what he saw led him to a diagnostic conclusion that still applies today: most of what passes for conversion is only the temporary operation of common grace, not the implantation of saving grace. This isn't cynicism. It's diagnostic precision. Edwards could tell the difference because he had a rigorous framework for what regeneration actually is, and most people—then and now—don't meet it. The problem isn't that people lack religious experience. It's that they mistake temporary moral improvement for permanent nature change. They assume that because they felt convicted, made a decision, and showed some behavioral improvement, they must be regenerate. But Edwards would say: all of that can happen under common grace, operating on your natural faculties without changing your nature at all. The distinction Edwards draws is this: common grace is the Spirit's work on your existing nature—illuminating your mind, intensifying your conscience, restraining sin, even producing joy in religious activities. It's real divine activity, but it operates on the equipment you already have. Saving grace, by contrast, implants a new spiritual sense—a capacity you didn't have before. Edwards calls it a new perception of divine beauty, specifically the moral beauty of God's holiness. This isn't your natural reason working better or your emotions responding more intensely. It's the creation of a faculty that perceives God's excellency in itself, apart from what it means for you, and produces a love that reorients your entire will. That love is the defining mark of regeneration. Not intensity of feeling. Not amount of moral progress. But a new inclination toward God's beauty for its own sake. People operating under common grace pursue God because of what he provides—salvation from hell, relief from guilt, heavenly rewards. That's enlightened self-interest, and it produces real but temporary change. People with saving grace pursue God because holiness itself appears glorious to them. They love what is supremely excellent, regardless of personal benefit. One kind of religion fades when the emotional intensity drops or the cost rises. The other persists because the nature itself has been changed. This is why Edwards could say most church members weren't converted. They showed conviction, decision, reformation—but they lacked the one thing that mattered: a new love for divine beauty that couldn't be explained by self-interest. And this is why his framework still matters today. The modern church is full of people who prayed a prayer, had an emotional experience, started attending services, and noticed some life improvement—so they concluded they're saved. But the diagnostic question Edwards would ask is: why did you change? Was it fear, social pressure, desire for a better life, even gratitude for forgiveness? Or was it because you encountered the beauty of holiness and couldn't help but love it? The difference becomes observable over time. When the emotional high fades, when the social reinforcement stops, when obedience costs more than it benefits—what do you pursue then? If your religion was built on common grace, you'll drift. If it was built on a new nature that loves divine beauty, you'll struggle and fail, but you won't permanently abandon what you love. Edwards didn't just diagnose the problem. He gave tools to examine yourself rigorously, to distinguish true affections from false ones, to build assurance on something more stable than feelings or performance. This video introduces that framework. The series that follows will show you how to use it.