5 Brothers. 5 Countries. $500 Billion. The Rothschild Strategy That Lasted 210 Years. скачать в хорошем качестве

5 Brothers. 5 Countries. $500 Billion. The Rothschild Strategy That Lasted 210 Years.

5 Brothers. 5 Countries. $500 Billion. The Rothschild Strategy That Lasted 210 Years. In 1810, Mayer Amschel Rothschild created a financial strategy that no family has ever replicated: He sent his five sons to establish banks in the five financial capitals of Europe—Frankfurt, London, Paris, Vienna, and Naples. One family. Five countries. Operating as a coordinated network while every other bank operated alone. 210 years later, the Rothschild family is worth an estimated $400-500 billion across 500+ descendants, making them likely the richest family in history. This is the documented story of how they built it, how they kept it through eight generations, and why they're still wealthy when families like the Vanderbilts lost everything in three generations. THE 5-SON STRATEGY - DOCUMENTED HISTORY: Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812) started as a coin dealer in the Frankfurt Jewish ghetto. By 1769, he became court factor (financial agent) to Prince William of Hanau, managing millions from Hessian soldier rentals during the American Revolution. But Mayer's genius wasn't just banking—it was network building. He trained all five sons in finance, then deployed them strategically: 1. Nathan Mayer Rothschild → London (1798) - Founded N M Rothschild & Sons (1811) 2. James Mayer de Rothschild → Paris (1811) - Founded de Rothschild Frères 3. Salomon Mayer von Rothschild → Vienna (1820) - Founded S M von Rothschild 4. Carl Mayer von Rothschild → Naples (1821) - Founded C M de Rothschild e figli 5. Amschel Mayer Rothschild → Frankfurt (stayed) - Ran M A Rothschild & Sons INDUSTRIAL DOMINANCE (1830-1900): The Rothschilds didn't just finance governments—they owned infrastructure: European railroads (French Chemin de Fer du Nord, Austrian Nordbahn), Almadén mercury mine (Spain, largest in world), Rio Tinto mining (copper, iron), De Beers diamonds (South Africa), Suez Canal financing (Egypt), Baku oil fields (Azerbaijan, competed with Rockefeller), plus extensive real estate across Europe. THE BOTH-SIDES STRATEGY (Documented): Historical records confirm the Rothschilds financed multiple sides in conflicts: Austro-Prussian War (1866) - financed both Austria and Prussia, Franco-Prussian War (1870-71) - financed both France and Prussia. This wasn't warmongering—it was business. Governments needed war financing. The Rothschilds provided it. Whoever won could repay. This strategy guaranteed they were always on the winning side and made fortunes from both war and post-war reconstruction. WEALTH PRESERVATION SYSTEM: The Rothschild system for generational wealth: Family governance requiring consensus among brothers for major decisions, Male-only inheritance initially (concentrated wealth, controversial but effective), Intermarriage encouraged (over 50% of marriages between Rothschild cousins in 1800s), Extreme discretion and privacy (avoided public displays unlike Vanderbilts), Geographic diversification (five countries meant no single nation's collapse destroyed family), Professional trustees managing assets across generations, Private ownership (never went fully public, maintained control). SURVIVAL THROUGH CRISES: The Rothschilds survived every major catastrophe: 1848 European Revolutions (lost money short-term, financed restoration), World War I (Vienna and Frankfurt branches damaged, London/Paris branches survived), 1917 Russian Revolution (lost estimated $50-100M in Russian assets, absorbed loss), 1929 Great Depression (lost money but maintained core banks), World War II & Holocaust (Nazi seizure of Austrian/German properties, Baron Louis held for ransom, French estates occupied, British/American branches preserved wealth), 1981 French nationalization of Banque Rothschild (rebuilt new bank within 3 years). DISCLAIMER This video is for educational and informational purposes only. It presents historical analysis, opinions, and interpretations based on publicly available sources. It is not financial advice, political advice, or a prediction of future events. All historical comparisons and references to modern countries or governments are theoretical and should not be interpreted as claims, certainties, or endorsements. Viewers are encouraged to research independently and draw their own conclusions.