У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Col Douglas Macgregor: IRAN WAR U.S. Losing Position in the World или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
** NEW MERCH ** Jackets & Sweatshirts, Thermo Mugs!! Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavis... Col Doug Macgregor argues that targeting and killing Iranian leaders will not weaken Iran or cause internal collapse. Instead, they believe it strengthens national unity and resistance, especially since many Iranians view the U.S. as acting on Israel’s behalf. They contend Iran’s leadership and population are unlikely to submit, regardless of assassinations or military pressure. They dismiss claims that Iran is close to capitulating and say talk of installing a new, U.S.-friendly government is unrealistic. In their view, President Donald Trump is “marketing” the war—projecting confidence, claiming unlimited ammunition supplies, and portraying success—despite reported logistical constraints and limited missile inventories. They cite concerns about U.S. naval missile stocks, resupply challenges, and strained logistics. They also highlight what they see as contradictions in Trump’s messaging: presenting himself as a “peace president” who would have prevented other wars while now initiating one. They argue rebuilding the military is a long-term process that cannot be accomplished in a single term, dismissing claims that the armed forces were fully restored earlier. Strategically, they assert the U.S. misunderstands the nature of victory. Iran’s goal, they argue, is simply survival and continued resistance—while the U.S. definition of victory would require total defeat and regime change, which they see as unrealistic given geography and political realities. Overall, they portray the conflict as likely to be long, logistically difficult, and driven more by political messaging than achievable military objectives.