У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Are Aston Martin AT RISK Of NOT Racing At The Australian GP?! или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
F1 Reverse Merch now available at https://f1reverse.com/ Aston Martin might not be allowed to race in Australia. Their engine can't complete a race distance. They're four seconds slower than Ferrari. And Honda just admitted they've done an awful job. How did the team with Adrian Newey become the worst in a decade? This is one of the most dramatic collapses in recent F1 history, and today I'm breaking down exactly what went wrong. By the end of this video, you'll understand why Honda's engine can't even recover energy at the minimum required level, how the team went from most hyped to genuine 107% rule territory, whether there are actually any signs of life at Aston Martin, and what their realistic chances are of making it to the grid in Melbourne. Let's get into it. #AstonMartin #AustralianGP #F1 #Formula1 #F12026 #F1News #F1Breaking #AstonMartinF1 #F1Rumours #AlbertPark #F1Season #Motorsport #GrandPrix #F1Update #F1Analysis 00:00 Introduction 00:45 DEAD ON ARRIVAL 04:43 HONDA ADMITS FAILURE 06:37 WHAT HAPPENED TO HONDA 08:26 SIGNS OF LIFE 11:53 THE 107% RULE 13:31 THE ALONSO FACTOR 15:16 WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN 16:54 RAPID RECAP Don't click this 👉 https://rb.gy/te3itc _____________________________________________________ ◀︎◀︎ Business Inquiries and Contact • For business inquiries, copyright matters or other inquiries please contact us at: formula1reverse@gmail.com ◀︎◀︎ Copyright Disclaimers • We use images and content in accordance with the YouTube Fair Use copyright guidelines • Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.” • This video could contain certain copyrighted video clips, pictures, or photographs that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.