Why Good Papers Still Get Rejected (It’s Not the Quality) скачать в хорошем качестве

Why Good Papers Still Get Rejected (It’s Not the Quality)

A technically strong, well-written paper can still get rejected — sometimes without even reaching peer review. In many cases, rejection has little to do with research quality and much more to do with strategy. In this video, I explain why good papers get rejected, starting from the editor’s desk. I discuss common reasons such as journal mismatch, credibility signals, cover letters, and reviewer fit — and how understanding the publication system can make rejection far less personal and far more manageable. This video is for early-career researchers, postdocs, and faculty members who want to understand how editorial decisions are actually made and why rejection does not necessarily reflect the quality of their work. 📘 Free Resource If you’re feeling stuck with publications or unsure what your next move should be, you can start with the free Research Planning Workbook linked below. It’s designed to help you think through publication decisions calmly and strategically. 🔗 Free Research Planning Workbook: [https://forms.gle/5YnrBcvFQUwbExaBA] ⏱️ TIMESTAMPS 00:00 Why good papers still get rejected 00:29 Most rejections happen before peer review 01:28 Journal scope mismatch 02:02 Why cover letters matter more than you think 02:40 Reviewer mismatch and randomness in peer review 04:14 What to do after rejection 05:15 Why rejection is often not about quality 🔔 Subscribe for weekly videos on academic publishing, research strategy, and career growth:    / @profgulsim   🌐 Website: https://gulsimkulsharova.my.canva.site/ #AcademicPublishing #PaperRejection #ResearchPublishing #PeerReview #EarlyCareerResearchers #AssistantProfessor #PostdocLife #AcademicCareer #ResearchStrategy #PublishingAdvice #JournalSubmission