The Swimming Pool Tax Deduction: A Forensic Audit of the "Ferris Limit" скачать в хорошем качестве

The Swimming Pool Tax Deduction: A Forensic Audit of the "Ferris Limit"

You spent $100,000 on a pool for "Hydrotherapy." You think the whole thing is tax-deductible. WRONG. The IRS views swimming pools as "Recreation" first. To unlock the deduction, you must navigate a minefield of case law, including the "Ferris Limit" (why you can't deduct the marble deck) and the "Value Increase Trap." As The Finance Observer, I’ve performed a forensic review of Cherry v. Commissioner. In this video, we dissect the math of the "Capital Expense Formula" (Cost minus Value Increase), the strict "Exclusive Use" standard (why one pool party kills your deduction), and the "Tax Annuity" strategy that lets you write off chemicals and heating for life. 🔴 SUBSCRIBE FOR WEEKLY FINANCIAL DEFENSE: Protect your retirement from corporate erosion and hidden tax traps.    / @the-finance-observer   FORENSIC BREAKDOWN: 0:00 The "Pool Paradox": Section 262 (Personal) vs Section 213 (Medical) 1:30 The Math Audit: The "Capital Expense Formula" (Why $100k becomes $40k) 2:10 The "Ferris Limit": Toyota vs. Ferrari (Why luxury features are denied) 3:05 The Legal Standard: The "But For" Test & Documented Disease 3:45 The "Cherry Log": The single document that won the Cherry case 4:50 The "Exclusive Use" Trap: Why diving boards are a red flag 5:35 The "Tax Annuity": Deducting electricity, chemicals, and repairs forever 6:20 Audit Proofing: The 5-Step Action Plan DISCLAIMER: I am The Finance Observer. This content is for educational purposes only. Medical deductions for capital improvements are high-risk audit triggers; always consult a qualified CPA and get a professional appraisal.