Why Linguists are highly skeptical of POLYGLOTS скачать в хорошем качестве

Why Linguists are highly skeptical of POLYGLOTS

Why don’t linguists openly celebrate YouTube polyglots? Imagine two university professors talking by the water fountain. One says, “I just discovered this amazing polyglot on YouTube.” The other replies, “How do you know? What’s the evidence?” This video explores that tension. It’s not about dismissing polyglots. It’s about understanding how academia thinks. Universities operate on data, definitions, and measurable outcomes. A performance on video — however impressive — is not the same as verifiable competence. So what does it mean to “know” a language? How do you quantify fluency? And why does this matter? We’ll look at: Why academics are skeptical of performance-based claims The difference between belief and evidence Why YouTube and universities operate in different systems What language learners should actually take from this This isn’t an attack on polyglots. It’s an exploration of standards, proof, and how we decide what to believe. If you’re serious about language learning, evidence, and intellectual honesty — this conversation matters. Subscribe for more discussions on language myths, CEFR, academia, and what actually works. OuiCommunicate teaches online French to adult learners https://ouicommunicate.com #LanguageLearning #FrenchLearning #polyglots #linguistics #LearnFrench