Courthouse Steps Decision: Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections скачать в хорошем качестве

Courthouse Steps Decision: Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections

Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections involved whether a candidate for federal office has standing to challenge an Illinois law that requires election officials to count mail-in ballots postmarked or certified as of election day and received within two weeks of the election. Following the 2024 election cycle, Congressman Michael Bost and two other political candidates sued the state board of elections, contending that counting ballots after election day violated federal law (principally 2 U. S. C. §7 and 3 U. S. C. §1, which set election day as the Tuesday following the first Monday in November). The district court dismissed the case, deciding the candidates lacked standing and the Seventh Circuit affirmed. Now the Supreme Court has reversed that ruling, holding in a decision by Chief Justice Roberts that Bost had standing to challenge the rules dealing with the counting of votes in his election. Join us for a Courthouse Steps program where we break down and analyze the decision and what its impacts may be. Featuring: Jason Torchinsky, Partner, Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak PLLC (Moderator) Hans A. Von Spakovsky, Senior Legal Fellow, Edwin Meese III Institute for the Rule of Law, Advancing American Freedom Featuring: Prof. Michael R. Dimino, Sr., Professor of Law, Widener University Commonwealth Law School (Moderator) Brad A. Benbrook, Founding Partner, Benbrook Law Group * * * * As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.