У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Oman's 90-Day Iran Deal: Why Your Gas Price Depends on a Leaked Document или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, видео которое было загружено на ютуб. Для загрузки выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием видео, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса ClipSaver.ru
On February 8, 2026, Omani mediators presented a leaked draft titled "Interim Energy and Security Framework" proposing a calculated trade: Iran commits to 90 days of restraint in the Strait of Hormuz—no tanker harassment, no mine deployment, no shipping interference—in exchange for limited banking channels allowing restricted oil exports to international markets under humanitarian monitoring. The framework represents diplomatic translation of mutual desperation rather than breakthrough, as neither Washington nor Tehran can easily accept terms that provide minimal relief while surrendering leverage, yet neither can afford immediate rejection when 20 million barrels of oil flow daily through the waterway representing 20 percent of global petroleum consumption. This analysis examines how a provisional document negotiated in Muscat connects to household economics through specific mechanisms: American families driving 15,000 miles annually face potential $1,500 transportation cost increases if Strait closure drives gasoline from $3.40 to $6 per gallon, while Iranian households enduring four-hour daily power cuts and bread prices tripled from 50,000 to 150,000 rials calculate whether banking channels stabilize inflation at 40 percent or accelerate toward 50 percent—a distinction between continued hardship and catastrophic deprivation. Drawing on historical precedent from the 2015 nuclear agreement where Iranian oil exports climbed from 1.3 million to 2.8 million barrels daily before collapsing to 400,000 following Trump's 2018 withdrawal, the gap between 90-day restraint commitments and permanent security arrangements reveals how temporary diplomatic frameworks postpone worst outcomes without resolving incompatibilities that make future crises as likely as present negotiations are fragile. Disclaimer: All content on this channel is provided for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing presented should be considered financial, investment, legal, or political advice.