“221 Isn’t Over .08!” Defendant Uses AI in Court — Judge Explains Basic Math скачать в хорошем качестве

“221 Isn’t Over .08!” Defendant Uses AI in Court — Judge Explains Basic Math

In this Wisconsin OWI (3rd offense) case, defendant Benjamin Lampre tries to argue that an AI chatbot proved his BAC wasn’t over the legal limit—because he believes the test is “in thousandths” while the law is “in hundredths.” The judge and attorneys explain why the argument fails, warn him about going to trial, and ultimately sentence him under the court’s Intoxicated Driver Intervention Program (IDIP) guidelines. This hearing includes: The defendant’s AI-based BAC math argument The court’s explanation of decimals, BAC, and legal limits A tense exchange with repeated interruptions Sentencing terms including jail time, fines, ignition interlock, and license revocation A cautionary example of why relying on AI over legal/scientific experts can go wrong fast ⚖️ Court: Barron County Circuit Court, Wisconsin ⚖️ Judge: Judge Melissa Mogan ⚖️ Charge: OWI 3rd offense (plus PAC merged/dismissed) Disclaimer: This video is for education and commentary. It is not legal advice. All individuals are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law. 👍 Like, subscribe, and comment: Should courts address AI misunderstandings more directly? wisconsin owi, owi third offense, dui court, dui sentencing, bac explained, blood alcohol content, 0.08 legal limit, ignition interlock, license revoked, court hearing, courtroom breakdown, judge shuts down defendant, defendant argues with judge, ai in court, chatgpt in court, ai defense fails, intoxicated driver intervention program, idip wisconsin, barron county circuit court, judge melissa mogan, dui bodycam, dui arrest, dui lawyer, criminal court, legal commentary, courtroom footage, the judges gavel #Court #DUI #OWI #Wisconsin #AI #ChatGPT #BAC #Judge #Courtroom #LegalCommentary Chapters 00:00 Intro / Case overview 00:35 Charges & IDIP program explained 01:10 Plea hearing begins 02:00 Defendant raises the “AI math” BAC question 03:05 Judge reacts: “That’s a scientific question” 04:05 BAC limit vs test results explained 05:15 Judge breaks down decimals (hundredths vs thousandths) 06:25 “Do you want a trial?” warning & consequences 08:40 Defendant agrees to plea / admissions 11:40 Sentencing arguments (state vs defense) 14:30 Judge’s warning about future OWIs (felony consequences) 17:20 Sentence announced (jail, fines, interlock, revocation) 19:00 Monitoring rules: zero alcohol / no good time / no Huber 21:00 Payment plan & appeal deadline 23:30 Aftermath: later revoked-license charges noted 24:30 Closing thoughts / accountability theme